healthcare master case study baum c m et example

Healthcare Professional, Health Psychology, Reliability, Overall health Assessment

Excerpt from Case Study:

Health-related Master Example

Baum, C. M., ainsi que al. (2008). Reliability, Quality, and Specialized medical Utility from the Executive Function Performance Test out: A Measure of Executive Function in a Sample of People With Stroke The American Journal of Work-related Therapy sixty two (4); pg 446.

Study rationale. Your research study is designed to assess the quality and reliability of a check for professional function in post-stroke work-related therapy sufferers. Clinical tests of executive function may not be very good predictors of your patient’s capability to function in day-to-day your life. The Exec Function Functionality Test (EFPT) employs regular daily living expertise in which the post-stroke patients will probably have engaged in the past, and they are reasonable target behaviors pertaining to adaptation to independent or perhaps supported living arrangements. The test is particularly useful for that it offers a practical test intended for executive function using real-world tasks.

Analysis design. An experimental design is employed in this study. A control group is used to assess the utility and sensitivity of the EFPT to degrees of stroke-related dysfunction. Data collected in the study was quantitative and was analyzed employing statistical types of procedures. Three ideas were determined prior to the beginning of the actual research.

Distinguishing characteristics of EFPT. The EFPT supervision protocol appears easy to study. A manual is given that articulates how test managers are to present the four tasks, “cue” the sufferers, and score their habit. The several distinct duties are designed to elicit behaviors which will isolate cognitive components of the executive capabilities activated during task finalization – these kinds of findings will certainly later assist to determine a course of therapy or treatment. The EFPT promotes top-down objective assessment of exec function as demonstrated through the efficiency of actual tasks. This aspect of the test avoids the pitfalls of predictive tendencies based on contrived or proxy server task functionality. Also, on a very practical level, the test provides specific details about support or perhaps assistance demands of the sufferers with regard to their very own near future functionality of the several tasks.

Analysis variables. The independent factors were era, gender, contest, and educational level of the study members. Level of impairment at 6 months post-stroke while measured by their admission rating on the National Institutes of Health Cerebrovascular accident Scale was another important self-employed variable. The amount of dysfunction post-stroke was operationalized by creating three groups of participants: A control group, a mild heart stroke group, and a average stroke group. The dependent variables had been subjects’ scores on the EFPT, scores within the neuropsychological assessments, and the scores on the practical outcome testing.

Reliability steps. Reliability identifies consistency throughout test (measurement) repetitions. To get a test to be reliable, it should good test-retest results and good inside consistency. Interrater reliability was assessed by having three educated raters concurrently score the job performance of a number of examine participants, and calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). To evaluate for internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha relationship was used to check all conceivable combinations pertaining to correlation. A Pearson’s relationship coefficients were calculated for the relationship among each of the test domains as well as the total test score. In all instances, reliability measures had been in the excessive acceptable range.

Validity measures. Validity is a estimate of the strength of research with regard to the a conclusion drawn. You will find four types of validity: Conclusion, exterior, internal and construct. Build validity identifies the accuracy and reliability with which a technique actually steps what it is designed to measure. Significant differences between your post-stroke patients and a great age-matched control group are required to indicate that the test shows the discriminative validity (within the larger category of construct validity), in that, results that are likely to not become related do not, in fact , display correlation.

Significant differences had been found among the three groupings for the total scores, responsibilities, and exec functions, except for initiation. The particular cooking subtest was found not to discriminate between the moderate and modest participants. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing the scores