Spirituality Assessment Essay

After making use of the spirituality examination model Mor-VAST, the author found out how important faith and prayer were in her individual. As stated simply by Skalla and McCoy (2006), The Mor-VAST model is actually a way to explain individuals’ spirituality.

Clinicians can use it as a concrete method for assessing spiritual strengths and weaknesses and also to build or bolster patients’ sense of self. After the author started to be familiar with L. H., your woman realized that the girl discovered that her patient assumed and concentrated her into the life about prayer. T. H. ‘s strong trust kept her at peace and allowed her to endure repeated hospitalizations, when still creating a positive attitude.

Due to the fact that mcdougal developed an excellent relationship with J. H., this brought about good patient-nurse communication, and in addition allowed the patient to disclose her deep personal thoughts which might be sometimes very private to many individuals. “Respecting patients’ psychic growth by simply attending to “being” rather than to “? xing” is a important premise” (Skalla, McCoy, 2006). Allowing the patient to talk without interruptions is important, as this will just tell the person that one is usually an receptive individual, but it will surely also display patients that attentiveness does mean that the individual truly likes you what they say.

A nonjudgmental approach is highly encouraged the moment assessing or perhaps speaking to patients regarding their own personal opinions and opinions. “Cultural skills is particularly crucial in this industry as several cultures have different views on spiritual techniques and religion” (JACHO, 2005). In regards to the foreseeable future, the author thinks that she would not modify her connection skills on the patient neither towards the way the nurse patient relationship was established. Mcdougal does state that one possibility that could be improved in the future may be the use of other spirituality evaluation tools like the HOPE examination tool, which also tackles a different element regarding spiritual techniques assessment.

Obstacles were not determined within the author’s assessment of the patient’s spiritual techniques. The patient and author both equally communicated successfully and even though J. H. was only The spanish language speaking, the author’s fluency in The spanish language called for simply no evidence in barriers. With this assessment mcdougal took her time to listen attentively to her patient.

The author knew essential faith and prayer were for her patient and allowed the patient to convey herself widely and continue to practice her religious faith in the hospital placing. The author recognizes herself with J. They would. simply because they the two are of Catholic faith and have similar methods and values in regards to spiritual techniques. This evaluation was basic due to the commonalities between affected person and doctor. “Nursing’s job is to never lead the way yet instead to aid patients on the journey” (Skalla, McCoy, 2006).

Since the author experienced no set back in her examination findings, if perhaps there were any at any given time, associated with involving pastoral care to permit the patient to show and continue spiritual requirements should be easily accessible. In conclusion, multiple disciplines will probably be involved in patient’s spiritual tests in the medical center setting. About admission towards the hospital, an assessment when it comes to religious personal preferences is taken and considered.

Educating staff regarding spiritual assessment is important. Allowing the sufferer to continue traditions and cultural preferences is important, as many civilizations consider spiritual health as part of healing the mind and human body. Even though the religious assessment is very important to assess in case the patient has a religious affiliation, the solo purpose can be not determine a religious practice, but still have spiritual needs that should remain assessed. Sources Joint Commision on Accreditation of Health-related Organizaions. (2005).

Evaluating your spiritual evaluation process. Joint Commission: The origin. Vol three or more, Issue 2 . Retrieved Drive 1, 2013 from: http://professionalchaplains.org/files/resources/reading_room/evaluating_your_spiritual_assessment_process. pdf Skalla, K., McCoy, P. (2006).

Spiritual Assessment of individuals with tumor: The ethical authority, professional, aesthetic, cultural, and transcendent model. Oncology Nursing Discussion board. Vol thirty-three. No . 4. P 745-51.

Retrieved upon February twenty-eight, 2013 via: http://ehis. ebscohost. com. selection. gcu. edu: 2048/ehost/detail? sid=eb24c49f-f3bb-4d62-a28c-c844296b4d85%40sessionmgr15&vid=1&hid=16&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=rzh&AN=2009223146 University of Maryland Medical Center (UMM) (2011). Spirituality. What is spirituality?

Gathered February twenty eight.