The Iraq battle was a unpleasant thing. This caused lots of things to happen.

NEED AN ESSAY WRITING HELP?

I’m against gonna war with them because there were zero weapons of mass break down in Korea as the US government claimed. You should know listed by George W Bush for the war was to secure Iraq’s chemical and biological weaponry, which did not even exist. Secondly, there are no terrorists in Iraq, and Korea had simply no connection to September. 11. We should have concentrated our assets in Afghanistan where the actual terrorists had been.

We will write a custom essay sample on
A Fever You Can't Sweat Out by Panic! At the Disco
or any similar topic specifically for you
Do Not Waste
Your Time
HIRE WRITER

Only $13.90 / page

Thirdly, we were underprepared to get the job of Korea and couldn’t deal with the insurgency that followed. And finally, the conflict was a large waste of resources that the US received nothing coming from. The United States dropped over 1, 040 American soldiers struggling in this conflict that we acquired nothing by. The battle has hurt our region economically considerably. Over $151.

1 Billion has been out towards the battle. I feel as from this end result that we shouldn’t have gone to war with them. It’s a hard thing to put our country through. Iraq was attacked by the United States back in of 2003.

The US visited war with Iraq, because on possibly the government or disinformation, and the began reason possess changed above the time. The key reason given by the administration of George Watts. Bush is that Saddam Hussein the leader of Iraq was engaged in having nuclear guns.

Many thought that Hussein may well use these kinds of weapons to attack resistant to the United States. You should know for the attacks upon Iraq was to disarm all of them of virtually any weapons of mass break down that they have. This makes sense to stop future terrorist attacks, but no weapons of mass destruction had been in War.

Iraq do use weaponry of mass destruction inside the 1980’s however, not since then. The majority of Iraq’s guns of mass destruction were destroyed or otherwise made unusable in the 1990’s. Also, Saddam wanted to remain in power.

Using weapons of mass break down would mean a sure end to his power. This kind of calls into question regardless of whether invading Korea was validated because the Rose bush administration should have known that weapons of mass destruction in War were successfully contained. Mainly because Iraq is definitely effectively contained, it was not anymore an imminent threat to the United States or any type of other countries anymore.

Saddam Hussein experienced never vulnerable to assault the United States in order to use guns of mass destruction offensively. Sure, Iraq’s surrounding countries such as Kuwait and Iran hated Saddam Hussein, nevertheless they were not scared of him. They will knew that Iraq was the weakest region in the region. Iraq had been weak and manageable since the Gulf of mexico War and has not troubled its friends and neighbors.

If Iraq is not a threat, there were no explanation to be attacking them. Iraq was not active in the September 11th attacks. So why did we go to conflict with these people?

Since, the war experienced continued, as the forces from the US had been attacked simply by Iraqi guerillas. The US recognized a new democratic government within Iraq, which was opposed by various Islamic groups that held power in the country. The attempted to control the circulation of essential oil from Korea, one of the largest petroleum producers in the Middle East.

Prev post Next post
ESSAY GUIDE
Get your ESSAY template and tips for writing right now