Ethical issues in work Essay

In group work, pressure on the people involved can be inevitable. Nevertheless , there are distinctions between therapeutic pressure along with undue pressure.

Therapeutic pressure results in adaptive anxiety. The mere occurrence of others is going to put pressure on each from the individuals inside the group to behave within a certain way during every session. This is certainly acceptable.

Pressure is said to be beneficial when it leads to that individual’s resolution of what concerns he or she wanted to be solved. However , unnecessary pressure makes its way into a group treatment when the person is no longer able to utilize their right to decline certain aspects of the therapy or to stop at particular points of a task designated to him or her. (Corey et al, 2007) There may not always be outright reversal, overturning, annulment of this correct but rather a subtle coercion as a result of unnecessary pressure within the said participator of the group remedy. Thus ethical boundaries will be overlooked as well as the situation has ceased to be adaptive towards the individual’s welfare and needs.

In the case study (Herlihy & Corey, 2006), Jones was dishonest in the way he had two users of the group check out their feelings through role playing. In person, I believe having been overstepping his boundaries as the group leader. Also, he was performing without thinking of what would be best for the two individuals. I came across it very questionable that he asked Kevin, among the participants, to role perform by telling his intimate feelings about a member of the contrary sex. This task of disclosure without preceding consent was obviously a clear case in point, in my point of view, of how a group leader can sometimes misuse his meaning ascendancy within the other associates of the group.

Likewise, the added task of having Kevin ask Linda on a actual date and after that telling him personal opinions about his girlfriend was very much out of collection. As a group head he needs to have acted more appropriately and thought of other tasks that might have been significantly less demanding and fewer coercive in nature. The group innovator, in this case, was most certainly behaving unethically.

Having been asking Kevin to change with him request Linda away and by informing him speculations about his girlfriend. Kevin should have the choice on who he really wants to ask out and on what he would like to conclude regarding his girlfriend. Especially with the work of the job, Kevin needs to have first recently been informed with the details ahead of he was asked to accept to it. Nevertheless , undue pressure made Kevin agree quickly and might therefore have induced damage or trauma which the group leader was designed to protect him from. Having Kevin concede his dreams about Linda in front of the group may have caused Hermosa trauma and psychological injury.

Ryan must have considered what things Bela would locate complimentary. Thrusting her in times might have induced her pain. Ryan’s analysis only showing how Kevin sensed afterwards was inconsiderate of the other member of the group mixed up in activity, Linda. (Herlihy & Corey, 2006).

If I had been the company leader of the group, I would include intervened when ever Ryan asked Kevin to role get Linda and again when he gave him an task. As a innovator, one should usually take into consideration the effect one has for the others in the group. The pressure one puts with such asks for as part playing and assignments, should always be considered. As well, I would advise Ryan to consider the diversity of the people in the group and to consider first that what this individual thinks would help Linda’s self-image might not be what she would consider being helpful very little.

I would most definitely have intervened and reminded Ryan that he was in charge of the internal well-being plus the lessening from the discomfort of these individuals because they exposed themselves to the activities of the group. They have to not always be placed in unacceptable positions where they are forced to divulge more about themselves than they can be willing to. The members must always be clearly shown they have an option to refuse as well as to cut off virtually any activity they have been asked to do. (Corey ou al, 2007)