Corporate Ethics Failure – A Critical Analysis Essay


Arthur Andersen, in 1913 proven a corporate organization that for many years provided a benchmark for auditing and consulting in the accounting market. From the onset Mr. Andersen worked to develop a base for his company associated with the principles of excellence inside the technical and ethical facets of his fresh company.

His ethical model focused on Utilitarianism, the greatest quantity of good to get the greatest quantity of people. In the late 1940’s following the founder died, newly hired CEO, Elderly Partner Leonard Spacek, further exhibited his leadership and commitment to moral practices by simply helping to establish the Accounting Principles Plank, their prinmary responsibilities getting to set sector accounting and ethical criteria. This is a direct reflection around the commitment Arthur Andersons business staff put on the company’s belief in performing all their practice in an honest and trustworthy way. Spacek was so revered that previous Federal Hold Chairman Paul Volker when refered to as Spacek’s tenure as a time when Arther Andersen was the “Gold Standard ” for the accounting sector.

These standards built a reputation inside the accounting community which triggered tremendous accomplishment. Honesty and integrity were trademarks of the company that concentrated about quality, leadership and growing its employees to be authorities in every element of the accounting industry. Since the business began to grow, Arthur Andersen became a leader in the financial sector, employing just as much as 77, 000 accounting professionals in 84 countries.

A mirrored image on the many positive aspects of Arthur Andersen, its dedication to the various ethical rules it championed, both in its own corporate structure and that of the accounting community. In this copy writers opinion, with such metrics in place, it truly is amazing that such a large entity may implode and collapse. However , if 1 understands the value of honest behavior as well as the impact of lost trust, the research is not so difficult.

The problems came across at Arthur Anderson were the result of unacceptable ethical tendencies which resulted from compromises of their own honest standards. These kinds of began little issues intended for various customers that after some time grew making a slippery incline from which Arthur Andersen wasn’t able to recover. Business enterprises happen to be funded simply by investors, stockholders and customers. Likewise, their particular activities, the two internal and external, as well affect investor, stockholder, stakeholder and customer. All be based upon the economical health and stability of the company to support all their individual pursuits.

The responsibility with the SEC is to verify financial wellbeing and supply a tool which is why potential investors and inventory buyers may fairly assess the risks included as they choose company their money should support. Auditors discuss the responsibility the provide examination of the the financial condition while looking for errors in the bookkeeping/ accounting from the company’s financial position. The auditor’s responsibility is usually to correct or balance any errors as a result preventing a misleading watch of the authentic financial durability of the organization. If this kind of view is usually compromised by providing or allowing for false data to can be found, the company’s position is weakened, investors are led under fake pretenses, putting their assets at risk.

The SEC depends upon a complete, thorough and genuine analysis via an auditor to verify the economic status providing security for these desiring to take a position or offer financial support. Arthur Andersen’s problems started out precisely as mentioned earlier, when ever executives started to Behave unethically in a manner against the rules on which the business was founded. It is important to note that although Arthur Anderson employed great business ethics, the company flourished. As it began to compromise it’s integrity the long run consequences at some point to appear.

The Enron fall represents just one of many cases wherever mistakes were made and concealed. For Arther Andersen, in corporate almost nine decades, the destruction of Enron documents to prevent the SEC from increasing access to incriminating evidence displays how dodgy the accounting firm had become. While millions of dollars in earnings for Arthur Andersen were at stake, the viability from the company counted on the reputation it gained.

The demise of the firm resulted in the dishonest methods it used to remain in power. By June, 2002, the company experienced laid off 7, 000 personnel, and dropped more that 650 of it’s two, 300 open public audit clientele with the layoff of countless numbers pending.

The slippery incline to termination had begun. http://money.cnn.com/2002/06/13/news/andersen_verdict/ In the article “12 Ethical Principles for Business Executives” by the Josephson Institute, published on December 17, 2010, stated that ” terminology establishing specifications or rules describing the kind of behavior a great ethical person should and really should not engage in, are honest principles. ” More specifically they are specified as “Honesty, Integrity, Promise keeping and Trusworthiness, Loyalty, Fairness, Concern for Others, Law Stable, Commitment in front of large audiences, Leadership, Popularity, Morale and Accountability. ” http://josephsoninstitute.org/business/blog/2010/12/12-ethical-principles-for-business-executives/ The founder, Arthur Andersen, embodied these principles to the point that this individual personally reimbursed a client for an accounting mistake made under his watch. Although a disclaimer on the part of Arthur Andersen protections against small mistakes inside the accounting audit/ review, it appears this create a gray region that was taken good thing about.

Also, management should have developed a actually zero tolerance device to maintain a great ethical lifestyle dedicated to avoiding inappropriate tendencies. Policy must have mandated regularly documented training on business ethics, and the importance of it is implementation while the auditing process ensued. Any problems should have visited the client with reconciliation mandantory prior to a great Audit Judgment being submitted. The indictment of Arthur Andersen and subsequent trial provided evidence the Examine Opinion and review of Enrons balance sheet and financial assertions were posted with the intention to skew the true current condition of the company’s true monetary condition, therefore deceiving the shareholders, panel of owners, potential buyers and stakeholders.

An overview from the measures set up to safeguard against inappropriate accounting behavior offer an insite to the items that had been violated during Enron and Arthur Andersens quest to bilk investors discuss holders of millions. ” These safety measures included Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Generally Approved Auditing Criteria (GAAS), Transactions on Auditing Standards (SAS), and all specialist ethics. The application of GAAP by accountants can be standard protocol. An accountant uses these principles as a couple of daily routine.

Relating to several accounting texts, GAAP is referred to as a “dynamic set of both broad and specific recommendations that firms should stick to when computing and confirming the information in their financial assertions. “” http://faculty.mckendree.edu/scholars/2004/stinson.htm The article “7 Principles of Admirable Organization Ethics” reveals seven further principles which usually complement ethical behavior. Individuals are “Be trustful, continue to keep and open up mind, meet up with obligations, have got clear files, become community involved, keep accounting control and be sincere. http://sbinformation.about.com/od/bestpractices/a/businessethics.htm To conclude, legal analyst’s formulate the opinion that “executives by Arthur Andersen and Enron did not attempted to have a good impact on the accounting market or any market.

They set out to make as much money for themselves as quickly as possible. These were willing to carry out whatever it took to make that money. These types of thoughtless acts and greed led both equally companies for an eventual problem in bankruptcy. ” The following prosecution of these firms features produced fresh controls that ought to serve to stop this type of economical disaster.

Especially the Sarbanes-Oxley Act including requiring businesses to reevaluate its internal audit techniques and makes sure the accounting practices both “meet or perhaps exceed the expectations in the auditors. ” http://faculty.mckendree.edu/scholars/2004/stinson.htm Assertion Regarding Specialist Conduct: “This assignment is definitely my own function. Any assistance I received in its prep is recognized within the project in accordance wth academic practice. If I utilized data, suggestions, words, blueprints, pictures, or other information coming from any supply, I have mentioned the source(s).

I understand that copying text message word for word from other sources devoid of placing it in offer marks is considered plagiarism and not acceptable whether or not I cite the source the place that the material was copied via. I approve that this task was well prepared specifically for this kind of class and has not been submitted in whole or in part, to any other course at Walsh or elseware. ”

  • Category: Ethics
  • Words: 1449
  • Pages: 5
  • Project Type: Essay