Nationalism After the War of 1812 Essay


Following the war of 1812, a surge of nationalism spread everywhere throughout America. Having unofficially won the war without an official armed service, the people of America started to be very proud of themselves and how their superb country set up such a feat. The nationalism grew until David Marshall, an aggressive Primary Justice, further strengthened and expanded it.

He was a devout Federalist appointed by John Adams years just before his most well-known case of Marbury vs . Madison in 1803. Becoming a Federalist having been a great competitor to Thomas Jefferson. He served until 1835 and was the forth Great Court Justice. His simply legal training was 6 weeks attending lectures at the College of Bill and Martha, however when he took the bench in 1801, he changed the Judicial Department as we know it. In fact , he made the part the most powerful section of the us government at that time.

His most significant early case was the famous Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which set up the right with the court to declare the actions of local, state or national governments incorrect if they will violate the Constitution. This process of declaring actions gap was known as Judicial Review and this made the Court just as powerful because the legal and professional branches of government. Another important circumstance was Matn vs . Hunter’s Lessee in 1816. The ruling by Marshall declared that the benefits of the Substantial Court expanded to the Point out Courts. The court today had the justification to directly assessment other legal courts decisions.

Yet another case, Cohens vs . Va strengthened this kind of right and extended the reach in the court to the citizens of the U. S. and states. Marshall’s court became more and more effective until it received the right to review almost all reduce court decisions. The famous Fletcher vs . Peck case ruled (in 1810) that the Best Court acquired the right to gap State regulations. The details lurking behind the case had been as follows: The Georgia legislature had granted extensive property grants in a deal with the Yazoo Property Company. This seemed dubious so the business was taken to court.

A subsequent legislative session repealed the grants or loans because of the corruption that got accompanied the original grant. The Supreme Court, with Marshall presiding, determined that the unique action by the Georgia Assemblage had constituted a valid deal, which could not be broken regardless of the problem. This was the first time that a State law was voided since it went resistant to the Constitution. In that case, after the warfare of 1812 Marshall granted more decisions that focused the federal government and Federalist suggestions.

In the McCulloch vs . Maryland case, Marshall ruled the state did not have the right to tax or perhaps regulate banking companies. This likewise encouraged monetary expansion and development. Inside the Dartmouth vs . Woodward circumstance it was declared that the declares had not any right to change or impair contracts unilaterally. It also marketed business expansion. The last important case was Gibbons vs . Ogden, which in turn further heightened federal power by lording it over that the Cosmetic had specifically given Congress the power to regulate commerce.

Beneath John Marshall, the Supreme Court attained enough power to surpass the power of the different branches from the government. This individual also announced many regulations and rulings that America still employs and lives under even now. Either way, this individual changed the Judicial department forever, especially at that time plus the world has not seen a far more intelligent person presiding.

  • Category: Warfare
  • Words: 601
  • Pages: 3
  • Project Type: Essay