House of fine sand and haze movie examination

Film production company House of sand and Fog, was seen by Jennifer Connelly and Ben Kingsley is based on a youthful book authored by Andre Dubus II. It begins by a conflict between Kathy Nicolo and Behrani Massoud. Both are require in a argument over who between them is a actual owner of a residence. The house can be on the shores of San Francisco, California. County authorities evict Kathy and Massoud receives the house through a public public sale. Kathy does not honor with her tax requirements.


She acquired also disregarded earlier alerts from the government bodies about her impeding eviction from the house. Kathy is definitely recovering from alcoholic beverages addiction. Massoud Amir can be an Iranian national, a former air force expert trying to restore his family of a wife, his only son and daughters following leaving his country.

We will write a custom essay sample on
A Fever You Can't Sweat Out by Panic! At the Disco
or any similar topic specifically for you
Do Not Waste
Your Time

Only $13.90 / page

Massoud believes that acquiring the home is part of the major actions towards noticing his present objectives of reclaiming the social location he held in Iran.

Conflict and struggle rules the movie. Both the warring attributes are trying to preserve what they value most inside the circumstances not their fault. This conventional paper is about how the themes of conflict and struggle are intertwining in the individual lives of the characters and the results it has on the relationships. The viewer will certainly realize in the long run that the pursuit of self-worth and everyday struggle for family and self makes people culpable to turmoil.

Kathy should never have disregarded the mails from the county officials that urged her to pay out taxes. Perhaps, this could have saved her the predicament. She is coping with the loss of her husband. Additionally, she is coping with drug dependency, which is an additional potential danger to her existence and dignity. Leaving the property to the Iranian lets her feel disappointed in her life. This is evident when ever she is noticed driving beyond daylight hours house and hates the sight in the foreigner fantastic furniture. This prompts her to attack the workers renovating the house until she damages her feet.

Surprisingly, Massoud’s wife and son deal with her feet with no booking. The deal with confirms her ill thoughts about carefully of the house by Iranian and she thinks she does not deserve that. She perceives this while her ethical failure to protect the value left with her by her late dad. Kathy promises to get the home back to very little and her brother who have lives far.

Kathy’s defensive player Frances Fisher, through the legal, argues that Massoud will need to accept someone buy of the house to Kathy at the cost he bought it. However , this seems incredibly elusive since Massoud is seemingly broke from losing his first work. To confirm his satisfaction before his daughter and son, and to keep his wife home, he had to keep the house. Probably, this could be due to the memories his entire family has regarding the good existence they had in Iran. Nederer, Massoud’s wife confirms her nostalgia once she says

“Do you remember our bungalow around the Caspian? Could ordered the trees reduce the western world side thus we may view the sea? Precisely what is the matter along Behrani? 

Massoud replies

“I today bought for people another maison. I acquired this label a price no-one would consider. It is really worth two, can be three times that.  (Dubus, 2004).

Massoud reproductions a lifestyle way over what he can actually find the money for just to please his family. He wants to15325 sell your house latter for a profit. The 2 parties happen to be in a discord they are not part of the cause. Kathy has supposed defaulting of tax remittances is wrongly imposed onto her while Massoud lawfully buys the house by using a legal public auction. The two are most definitely victims with the erroneous actions of the county authorities.

Lester Burdon, a deputy sheriff comes in as a third party. He is one of the representatives who supervise Kathy’s eviction.

The sheriff is definitely touched by her concern while privately admiring her irresistible beauty. Now, this is about to trigger conflict once again in Mister. Burdon’s family because he strategies to keep the relatives for Kathy. The two move in together within a cottage inside the woods. The sheriff uses his forces as a state officer to fight for Kathy. He suggests Kathy to sue the county because it erroneously positioned her residence on market. She hires an attorney recharged to ensure that she buys back the house on the price Massoud bought.

Mister. Burdon uses his location to bully Massoud. At this time Massoud proves to be strong-willed than him. He

stands firm to provide evidence that he bought the house legitimately and the mouthpiece sheriff is without right actually within his powers to frustrate him. He poises Massoud by simply saying he would have him deported in the event that he is not purchased the house to Kathy. Somebody watching may possibly think Massoud is the sheriff and Mister. Burdon may be the victim of his immorality.

The have difficulties continues pertaining to Kathy because her relationship with the sheriff would come to be bad luck than she expected. The two families are involved in a turmoil that non-e of them intended. At one point, Kathy is used back to her old home where she’s humiliated by sarcastic activities of Massoud who tells her, “There is a customer in the house.  He refers to Shoreh Aghdashloo, his partner. This discloses the threat she positions to the Bheraini family inside their pursuit to have a fortune in a country whose cultures they are down upon. However , the lady later doggie snacks Kathy with hospitality though she never understood nearly anything Kathy said.

Two items of evidence uncover the two styles of turmoil and struggle are a consequence of each other. First of all, the two struggling families are certainly not aware that the unfolding incidents are because of a mistake in the county officials. As they struggle to get the best for themselves, that they clash. Subsequently, the two edges do not genuinely hate the other person at all.

When Kathy attempts to commit committing suicide just exterior her aged house, Massoud saves her and usually takes her in. On stepping into the house, your woman tries to commit suicide again by taking a great overdose of pills and Massoud’s better half saves her by pushing her to vomit via an induction. The two of these pieces of data convinces viewers that indeed that Kathy and Massoud are subjects of a have difficulties they both have little control of. Furthermore, they are both on the right side with the law the sheriffs on different cases of the same case treat them.

Relationships happen to be ruined because everyone seeks to get the best for themselves. Lester’s struggle to prove his love to Kathy turns bad. He gets into a battle with Massoud beyond the county offices after the later on agrees to market the house towards the county with the price this individual purchased it. Massoud’s child becomes a sufferer of law enforcement officials misinterpretation after they find him pointing that gun at Lester as he holds his father, Massoud. He’d later die of gun injuries after they shoot him. In sadness, Massoud misgivings having misplaced his kid. He eliminates his wife and commits suicide. The entire family is demolished and Kathy does not have house at some point. She feels guilt ridden and acknowledges that the house was not legally hers once she say, “no, this is not my house when asked by a police officer. Kate locates the couples not yet dead. She attempts to save them but her resuscitation attempts fail as it is too overdue.

The viewers will know in the end the fact that pursuit of self-worth and everyday struggle to a family event and do it yourself makes persons culpable to conflict. Problems to achieve certain goals in life can lead to direct and indirect conflicts among people. At times, the warring parties might not be aware of their very own innocence but they may act guilty because of the circumstances they’ve been placed in. Just like the movie ‘House of Fine sand and Fog’, the two get-togethers were equally innocent nonetheless they received the worst treatment by the regulators. Kathy erroneously was evicted while Massoud lawfully bought the house through a public public sale. This educates us the lesson of sticking to our morals and learning never to ignore the very little things that could devastate the entire life.


  • Gelmingas, A. (2004). House of sand and fog. Birmingham: Vintage.

Read next:


Prev post Next post
Get your ESSAY template and tips for writing right now