Basic Ethics Essay

According to Michael Boylan’s book Simple Ethics study regarding ethics worries itself with “right” and “wrong, decision that give praise or perhaps blame. In the matter of ethics, these types of judgments are often assigned to people or to activities (Boylan, 2009).

This article will go over three significant ethical ideas, virtue ethics, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. It will also offer a personal experience to help describe the relationship between virtue, values, and ethical concepts as it relates to utilitarianism. The three values theories reviewed herein are the virtue integrity theory that examines a person’s figure over a very long period of time which is forgiving of the occasional mistake that is not in line with a person’s past persona.

Deontological ethics or duty-based morality is known as a theory depending on a “nonconsequentialist” view of folks and meaning decision-making. Deontological ethics helps that activities are not justified by their outcomes. Rather, factors other than good outcomes identify the “rightness” of actions (Deontological Integrity, 2014). Utilitarianism in the simplest term is based on measuring “good” in terms of usefulness. Utilitarianism is normally defined as an effort to achieve the very best good for the very best number.

Likewise this basic principle advocates the fact that ends warrant the means in other words if a negative actions must be used to get to a greater great then the justified (What Is Utilitarianism?, 2014). You will find marked dissimilarities between the three ethics theories.

Unlike deontic or action based hypotheses of values that give attention to the actions a person performs, the virtue theory, aka character ethics concentrates on helping persons develop good character qualities, like attention and generosity, “The deontological ethics is definitely grounded inside the “Categorical Very important, ” The Categorical Essential simply reports, “Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a universal law of characteristics. ” The Categorical Crucial is very similar to the “Golden Rule” of Christianity, and other religions (“do on to others whenever you would have all of them do unto you”)” (Deontological Ethics, 2014). On the other hand utilitarianism revolves around the notion that the end justifies the means.

Your own example I possess of utilitarianism being applied was when ever my Father is at hospice with terminal can range f cancer. This individual ordered a DNR, tend not to resuscitate. My children and I did not like his wish however it is what this individual chose intended for himself and we all accepted his final wish. Although some feel this is not right to just let someone pass away without looking to help the person dying the attitude about these decisions is simply determined by the person dying.

The utilitarian approach can be selfish in nature because the decision is firmly that of anybody thinking of his own real truth in my Fathers case his last about to die wish. So depending on what type of person you will be, how you had been raised, the surroundings you live in, your beliefs, the influences you may have from the social circle you belong to you all these factors may influence the ethics and depending on the circumstance on hand you can definitely find yourself shifting towards one or the other of these ethic theories. Morally or ethically, I would by no means let my father die without making some attempt to reanimate him but on the other hand I schedule my meaning belief and my integrity to allow my father his last and final wish.