War And Peace Essay

This kind of paper can talk about warfare and will take a look at whether conflict is a natural condition which is inevitable or whether conflict is just an invention of the human race and can be averted if thus desired. The paper will likely discuss the results of conflict and some in the factors which will trigger and initiate conflict. Margaret Meade defines war or rivalry as a recognized conflict among two teams as organizations, in which every group sets an army (even if the armed service is only twelve to fifteen pygmies) in the field to fight and kill, whenever possible, some of the associates of the armed service of the other group. (Meade, Margaret) Guy has been addicted to war for years and years.

In old times, man did not even need a very secure reason to go to war. He was used to hunting tribes, eliminating men and women and looting villages. Strength was perceived to be equivalent to the amount of lands you could conquer and also the number of people you can kill.

Men killed in cold blood and regarded as this way of living to get exciting and glorious. (James, William) This attitude has evolved to a hugely in the modern world. One can’t just go out and kill. By least in principle guy cannot destroy or loot or destruction another individual. According to William James, war can be permissible only when pressured upon 1, only when an enemy’s injustice leaves all of us no substitute.

Nevertheless, the senseless wars and destruction we see all around us today indicates that man’s desire and fascination for conflict and bloodshed has not reduced but is merely manifested differently. In other words, modern man follows all the innate pugnacity and everything the love of glory of its ancestors and forefathers. No wonder guy has engaged in so many mindless and irrational wars getting pain and horror to hundreds and thousands of men and women. (James, William) Man has become a constant supporter of war.

This is apparent from the quite a few conflicts prevalent all around the world. Coming from World Conflict I and II for the Korean War, Vietnam, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Columbia, West Lender and Gaza, Sudan, Yemen, Algeria, Gulf, Turkey, Bosnia, Kosovo, Sarajevo and so on, thousands of people are engaged in combat all across the globe and millions happen to be being killed and hurt.

If 1 only discusses the fatalities during the 1990s, one would notice that there are almost 2 million people dead in Afghanistan, 1 . five million dead in Sudan, around 800, 000 dead in Rwanda, half a million lifeless in Angola, quarter of a million deceased in Bosnia, 200, 500 dead in Guatemala; one hundred and fifty, 000 useless in Liberia; a quarter of any million lifeless in Burundi and seventy five, 000 useless in Algeria. You will discover hundreds and thousands of folks dying in conflicts between Israel and Palestine, Ethiopia and Eritrea, Columbia, Chechnya, Sri Lanka, Kosovo, Ireland, Poultry and not to forget the Local Gulf. In respect to figures, nearly 62 million people have died in the wars of the twentieth century.

This is nearly 20 million more than the number of military personnel which have been killed during the same period of time. According to Will Pendant, a historian, there have been only twenty nine years in all of human history during which a warfare was not underway somewhere. (Hedges, Chris). Since Sept. 2010 11, a brand new type of battle has begun brought on by attacks on America when Fresh York’s World Trade Center was demolished by two passenger aircraft being flown into them. Pentagon was also bombarded and it is assumed that a related attack was planned intended for the Light House yet did not materialize.

This started out the Warfare against Terrorism with the Usa taking the Taliban head-on and attacking Afghanistan in search of Osama Bin Filled. A similar warfare was started against Korea accused of carrying weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein was removed as the head from the state, put on trial and executed intended for his various crimes against humanity.

Nevertheless , the war against dread appears to be never ending. Although many might agree with the reason for this battle, the immense destruction and death which has been observed depicts the senselessness of signing up for such a conflict. You will find extremists at both ends Islamic fundamentalists on one side and aggressive commanders on the other. You cannot find any hope for any resolution in the event both parties do not listen to each other and will not make any kind of efforts to achieve peace.

It is apparent from the never ending bloodshed in Afghanistan and Iraq that gentleman is indeed dehydrated for bloodshed otherwise there is certainly simply no reason why such a battle will last this long. No person is successful and there will be zero conclusion in view. The theory that because gentleman is a conflict animal and has been and so for centuries is not a excuse to get the devastation of so many countries and the death of so many military and innocent civilians.

In reality there are many societies and people who have not undertaken any conflicts within their lives. These include the Eskimos and the Lepchas of Sikkim. non-e of the people be familiar with concept of warfare. Lepchas happen to be gentle and un-quarrelsome people while Eskimos, though not mild, observe no need for going to war for any cause whatsoever. It can be argued that Eskimos do not possess any property or any property to have any kind of reason to wage war. Which may be true but the fact nonetheless remains the theory than man is usually biologically created to wage war is apparently untrue if one discusses certain categories of people that have made it through for centuries with out waging any kind of war.

Hence, war is definitely an invention by mankind and even civilized or perhaps mild people may head to war if they happen to be aware of this kind of invention. Nevertheless , those who have no idea of battle will simply not go near war as they are not yet conscious of the invention. They could be violent or civilized; battle will never be a choice for them.

Relating to Margaret Meade, people who have no idea of of dueling will not battle duels, although their wives or girlfriends are seduced and their daughters ravished; they could on occasion commit murder nevertheless they will not deal with duels. Ethnicities which absence the idea of the vendetta will never meet every single quarrel in this way. (Meade, Margaret) Hence, war is definitely not a need but an invention. War may be avoided if perhaps human beings start to see the absolute absurdity of the whole exercise.

There may be never any kind of positive result of warfare. One get together always winds up losing and no one to judge whether the aspect which comes forth victorious is a one in the ideal. War may be the worst possible activity mankind can engage in and individuals should each work towards setting out alternatives apart from war to resolve conflicts. Works Cited James, Williams. The Moral Equivalent of Warfare.

From The Finest American Documents of the 100 years, Joyce Jean Gates, ed., and Robert Atwan, coed. 2000, 45-49, 52-55. Meade, Margaret. Rivalry: An InventionNot a Natural Necessity. Asia. 1940. Shrubs, Chris. Conflict Is a Push That Gives Us Meaning. Anchor, 2005.