The Modern Era Essay
Early Modern World Historians sometimes make reference to the time between the premodern (or medieval) and late modern eras as the “early contemporary world. ” The world in this era was increasingly usa by the projection of Euro power in foreign countries, especially in the Unites states. Although early modern Europeans still got little knowledge of, let alone hegemony (influence) above, the away from the coast regions of The african continent and Asia, the links created and focused by Europeans made the entire world a level for critical historical procedures.
Historians debate, or get past in silence, the problem of deciding the precise starting and ending dates of the early modern world and possess produced the particular vaguest consensus. Roughly, the era of the early modern day world commenced during the fifteenth century while using Timurid (relating to the Turkic conqueror Timur) and Italian language cultural renaissances. The year 1405 serves as a convenient starting date as it marks not simply the loss of life of Timur, the last great central Oriental conqueror to join farmers and nomads into a single empire, although also the first of the Chinese admiral Zheng He’s (c.
1371–1435) naval expeditions to the “Western Oceans. ” The time might be taken to end in the late 18th century with all the French and Industrial revolutions, both Western events of worldwide consequence back in the modern community. The doubt of this periodization derives partly from the idea of an early modern day Europe, using its own unsure chronological boundaries, and in portion from the unconsidered way in which equally phrases joined historical scholarship. Origins with the Concept Even though conceptually the phrase early modern globe is an extension of the expression early modern day Europe, your initial histories of both keyword phrases have some amazed.
The earliest well-known appearance with the phrase early on modern community occurs in Willard Fisher’s “Money and Credit Daily news in the Modern Market” from The Record of Personal Economy (1895). Although Fisher writes, “We all know that the system of bank credits and bank money, which was launched into the great commercial centers of the early modern world, has now gained a quite marvelous development” (1895, 391), the geographical sense of his affirmation is totally, if implicitly, European. However, the expression early contemporary Europe initially shows up twenty years later, in Dixon Jones Fox’s “Foundations of Western India Policy” in Personal Science Quarterly (1915).
Sibel remarks, “It was at this point realized by students of colonial time history that in the Carribbean [the “West India” of the article’s title] might greatest be followed the application of those principles which in turn formed the significant basis intended for the old kingdoms of early on modern Europe” (1915, 663). Ironically, the phrase early on modern Europe first appeared inside the Caribbean, inside the global circumstance of colonialism, in an article advocating trans-Atlantic history. Inside their debuts every phrase lose interest something of the other’s perception. Fox’s usage was a great anomaly, then when the term early modern day Europe arrived in Europe, completely come to be.
The expression early contemporary world, however , for decades would imply community to suggest, in an everlasting way, immediate rather than global surroundings; as this historical scholarship dealt with Western european subjects, the “early modern day world” was at fact “early modern Europe. ” Early modern world became global only with C. N. Strong’s school textbook The Early Modern Universe (1955) and S. Harrison Thomson’s 1964 review of L. H. Parry’s The Age of Examen, in which Thomson uses the phrase to describe the “story of the effective expansion of European opportunity, from The african continent to the reaches of the American indian Ocean by Arabs and Portuguese by simply sea, the movement westward to the Unites states and the early on transition by discovery to fishing, trading, and exploitation”(1964, 188). The first regarded as analysis from the early contemporary world came after the posthumous publication of Joseph Fletcher’s article “Integrative History” in 1985.
These kinds of analysis features tended to look at either a deductive or an inductive strategy. Deductive Procedure A deductive approach to the first modern globe compares premodernity and later modernity, devises the characteristics necessary to bridge both the stages, in support of then looks for confirmation inside the historical record. This approach assumes the existence of a modernizing trajectory, which the early on modern community shared with (and perhaps passed down from) early on modern The european union.
Informed with a Marxist point of view, the essentials of the early modern day world might highlight changes from se?orial to guttersnipe, from serfdom to wage-earning proletariat, and from local subsistence to regional marketplace economies. A functionalist knowledge of modernity, in the sort made the theory by the The german language sociologist Maximum Weber, the U. S i9000. sociologist Talcott Parsons, or maybe the French sociologist Emile Durkheim, explains interpersonal phenomena when it comes to their capability to fulfill interpersonal needs and broadens this base further than the function of creation.
Here the critical shifts would be from belief in miracles to belief in science, via household-based craft production driven by muscle, dung, drinking water, and real wood to factory-based mass production powered by simply electricity and fossil fuels, and from govt justified by simply tradition to government intentionally invented. Actually in the framework of early on modern The european union critics obstacle the effectiveness of a deductive way by condemning its inference of an inescapable progress via premodernity to modernity. A deductive way takes very little cognizance with the possibilities of different starting factors, different places, and particular paths.
In a few twentieth-century situations the transition to modernity was significantly less a development than a violently dramatic modify. When extended to a global context this approach becomes not only teleological (assuming a style or goal in history), but as well artificially Eurocentric. Inductive Way Rather than identify theoretical elements to be searched for in the period of time, an initiatory approach investigates what happened in several places and extracts from what happened a collection of common features. Although such an approach takes away the assumptive obstacle of the modernizing trajectory, the vem som st?r is playing the Herculean task of specifying operations that united all, most, or a lot of the world’s lenders.
Such an strategy need not focus on Europe, nor need it gauge the success of various regions regarding their progress along Europe’s path. How closely do the rough chronological parameters recommended here match the conventional historiographies (the writings of history) of the several regions outside the house Europe? Traditional periodizations in African and American background are immediately linked to Western european expansion.
Proclaimed by a Western european presence that can not yet master the place, an early modern day Africa may possibly last from your Portuguese capture of Ceuta, a port on the Moroccan side in the Strait of Gibraltar (1415), until the progress quinine and steamships in the nineteenth century. The initial Niger steamship expedition went back without casualties in 1854. An early modern day America might stretch through the encounters of 1492 until the period of independence movements, from 1776 for the independence of Brazil in 1822. An early modern India might begin with the 6th generation rejeton of Timur, Zahir-ud-Din Muhammad Babur, in whose ancestry encouraged him to conquer upper India.
The Mughal dynasty he founded (1526) might rule successfully for two decades; the English would take control of its Delhi center in 1803. An early modern day Japan stretches from the concentration efforts of Oda Nobunaga (1534–1582) towards the end from the Tokugawa shogunate (the dictatorship of a Japan military governor) in 1867. Other local historiographies fit less the natural way.
Although the Ottomans’ 1453 cure of Constantinople (modern Turki, Turkey) was timely, the Chinese Ming dynasty began too early (1368) and finished inconveniently during our early modern period (1644). More serious, key updating revolutions came up late in accordance with the european timetable – the Oriental Revolution in 1911, the Russian Bolshevik revolution in 1917, and the Kemalist (relating to the European soldier and statesman Kemal Ataturk) innovation in Poultry in 1923. The actual utilization of the expression early modern in the periodization of regional histories varies. Outside of The european union, it is most commonly used in Asia, especially in ideal for China, Japan, and, to a lesser magnitude, India.
Historians of Chinese suppliers sometimes prolong the period in to the twentieth 100 years. Far fewer historians compose of an “early modern Africa” or an “early contemporary Brazil. ” This fact is due in part to the benefits of the word imperialiste to identify these time periods. Latin American periodization is so consistently divided into pre-Columbian, colonial, and national durations that there is no need for the term early modern, which should correspond to the middle, colonial period. In fact , the phrase early on modern Mexico sometimes refers to the period soon after independence.
The divergence of the traditional periodizations of local histories, so frequently linked to high-level political record, should not shock. The global vem som st?r in search of an earlier modern world can look over and above these periodizations to seek techniques that surrounded wide swaths of the planet. Development of Global Marine Passages Absolutely nothing is more attribute of the early on modern universe than the creation of genuinely global marine passages. Before 1492 the Americas remained essentially isolated from Eurasia.
In 1788 the last essential sea passageway was completed by the initial permanent negotiation of Europeans in Australia. This kind of passage also concluded the integration of the Pacific Ocean as a physical concept, a procedure that began when the The spanish language explorer Euskera Nuñez de Balboa became the initially European to find the Pacific by America in 1513. Through the early 15th century the Europeans had been unlikely individuals to load the key role in this technique of exploration. Costa da prata exploration of the African coast was suffering, and mariners were unwilling to sail out of sight of land. Even the overland trips undertaken by simply Europeans came into existence more modest.
Muslims still controlled southern Iberia, and 1453 the Ottomans conquered Constantinople. Wise would have looked rather in the Chinese admiral Zheng He, whose several expeditions between 1405 and 1433 reached your shores of eastern Africa. A change in Chinese soberano policy stopped these trips, and the voyages that finally connected the earth were directed by Europeans. In 1522 the survivors of the expedition of the Portuguese navigator Ferdinand Magellan accomplished the 1st circumnavigation in the globe. Throughout the following generations a skilled chief and crew could get around a send from virtually any port to the port and reasonably expect to get there.
In 1570 the Flemish cartographer Ortelius published what has been identified as the first modern atlas, the Theatrum orbis terrarum (Theater from the World); this comprehensive however handy and inexpensive work loved immediate accomplishment. By the end in the period the best mapped area of the world will be China. Global Demographic Interconnections The world’s population bending during the early on modern period, from about 374 million (1400) to 968 million people (1800). Although demographic data are limited, some patterns arise. Rapid development was punctuated by a seventeenthcentury decline in Europe, Russia, Iran, Central Asia, China, and Korea – and recovery out of this decline happened globally, also in the Americas.
The more populated regions were known to expand more rapidly. The modern global marine passages arranged the level for a transatlantic “Columbian exchange” (the natural and social exchange between the New World plus the Old Globe that began with the 1492 voyage of Christopher Columbus) and for a transpacific “Magellan exchange” of crops and disease pathogens that position the peoples of the world in a more direct demographic romance than ever before. The arrival of American maize and potatoes in Eurasia, and later in The african continent, facilitated an intensive agricultural, and therefore demographic, expansion, and the overall look of tomato plants in Italia and soup peppers in India acquired important dietary and cooking consequences. Disease also started to be a global happening.
First showing in Europe in 1494, venereal syphilis reached India four years later, through 1505 it had outraced the Portuguese to China. The modern World’s solitude and limited biodiversity (biological diversity while indicated simply by numbers of species of plants and animals) would not afford their indigenous peoples the same immunities enjoyed by Europeans, who as kids were encountered with a multiplicity of attacks. Measles, smallpox, and other disorders brought by Europeans triggered a long-term market catastrophe.
The indigenous populace of central Mexico declined from 31 million in 1518 to 1. 6 million in 1620 – a genocide unintentional, misunderstood, and undesired by the Spanish who also sought spirits for solution and employees for their mines. Contact with the wider universe wrought identical demographic disasters on additional isolated individuals, including Pacific cycles Islanders, Siberian tribes, plus the Khoikhoi of southern Africa. Increased associates distributed pathogens more equally throughout the world and generally reduced susceptibility to outbreak disease.
Progress a Global Economy The development of global sea pathways integrated America into a really global overall economy. Rapidly growing extended distance commerce linked broadening economies in each continent. Nederlander merchants in Amsterdam may purchase commodities anywhere in the world, take them to Amsterdam, store these people safely, put value through processing and packaging, then sell them pertaining to profit.
Intensive production fueled by the commercialism of an increasingly global marketplace gave fresh importance to cash vegetation and sparked an unprecedented expansion inside the slave control. The motion of produced goods coming from eastern Asia toward Europe and America created a string of balance-of-trade deficits, which in turn funneled metallic from American mines to China. Frequent transpacific transact developed throughout the decades following the founding of Manila in the Philippines in 1571 and followed the same pattern: Exports of porcelain and silk sheets from China a new trade imbalance that drawn silver in the Americas and from The japanese.
Through military-commercial giants such as the Dutch East India Firm (founded in 1602), Western merchants interrupted traditional trading conditions in Africa and Asia to muscles into regional “country control. ” The expansion of settled foule, as well as the fresh ocean control route alternatives to the Silk Road that linked China to the West, contributed to the decline of nomadism. The agriculture of settled individuals supported significant populations and tax basics that an successful state can translate into everlasting military strength.
Development of Huge and Successful States The global trade in firearms and similar guns contributed to the expansion of large and efficient states, known as “gunpowder empires. ” Expensive and complex, the most advanced weapons started to be a monopoly of central states, which in turn employed those to weaken community opposition. Through the mid-fifteenth century the full of England used cannon to reduce some sixty castles annually. Management procedures as well became significantly routinized and efficient. Ever more abstract symbole of express authority followed the development of new sources of legitimacy.
From the Irrawaddy River in Asia to the Seine Water in Europe, religious order, regularity served to strengthen and validate centralized guideline. The ideal of universal disposition was indigenous to America, Africa, and Eurasia. Early modern unification of Britain with Ireland and Ireland was paralleled throughout European countries. If in 1450 European countries contained 1000 independent political units (or more, depending on the criteria), inside the nineteenth hundred years it covered around twentyfive. About twenty five independent city-states, khanates (state governed with a ruler with all the Mongol name “khan”), and princedoms were absorbed in the Russian disposition.
By 1600 the Tokugawa shogunate experienced unified Asia. Fourteenth century southeastern Asia had two dozen self-employed states that evolved in Vietnam, Siam (Thailand), and Burma (Myanmar) by 1825. The Mughals unified India north from the Deccan Plateau for the first time since the Mauryan disposition (c. 321–185 BCE).
Unification was also an overture to enlargement. In addition to an increasing Euro presence around the world, Qing Cina (1644–1912) invaded Xinjiang, Mongolia, Nepal, Burma, and Formosa, and during the seventeenth hundred years Romanov Russian federation stretched out to the Pacific. The new unities led relentlessly to new fragmentations and hierarchies, and capacity such centralizing political pushes was similarly universal.
During the century among 1575 and 1675, for instance , uprisings occurred in China, Asia, India, Armenia, Georgia, Kurdistan, Ukraine, the Balkans, the German gets, Switzerland, England, Catalonia, England, England, Ireland in europe, and Mexico. At the end of the period, french Revolution (1789) would get pleasure from global influence as the first innovation modern in the progressive, complete, and immediate nature. Amplification, rise of Property Use The conflit of human population growth, global markets, and aggressive says led to larger and more rigorous use of property.
Displacing or subordinating native peoples, innovators backed by hostile states exhausted wetlands and cleared forests to create new lands intended for intensive industrial, agricultural, and pastoral routines. (Similarly, business hunters pursued various species of flora and fauna to extinction available for sale on a global market. ) Oblivious to any kind of land promises held by indigenous lenders, states might offer leaders low taxes in exchange for settlement and land rights. For example , the Mughal Disposition provided area grants, Hindu merchants provided capital, and Sufi (Muslim mystic) brotherhoods provided leadership for the communities of Muslim innovators who transformed the Bengal wetlands in a key rice-producing region.
These kinds of efforts compensated for the extended disobliging weather patterns that plagued temperate specific zones throughout the Upper Hemisphere – a “little ice age” affecting climate throughout the early modern community. Religious Resurrection The most special religious attribute of this time was the global expansion of Christianity. Indeed, the impetus driving a car the creation of global sea passages was religious and commercial. The efforts of Catholic faith based orders predominated the great Simple missionary societies would be founded only in the 1790s.
Sufi brotherhoods including the Naqshibandiyah broadened Islam in Africa, India, China, and southeastern Asia. Tibetan Buddhism pushed in to northwestern Cina, Manchuria, Mongolia, Buryatia, also to Kalmikya, for the shore in the Caspian Marine, which continues to be today the only Buddhist republic in The european countries. The increased emphasis on orthodox and fiel conventions of Latin Christendom’s Reformation a new parallel in the Raskol schism of the Russian Orthodox Church during the 1650s. Elsewhere, Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab (1703–1792) founded the Wahabbi movement to reform Sunni Islam underneath strict Quranic interpretation. Various people assumed that the period that historians call “early modern” is the last.
Franciscan apocalyptic thought inspired Columbus, and the idea that the goodness Quetzalcoatl could return from your East in a One Reed year led the Aztec sovereign Montezuma II to regard the Spanish conqueror Hernán Cortés and his comrades as keen envoys. A Jesuit with the court of Akbar in 1581 located the Mughal ruler accessible to the idea of the imminent end since that season was eleven years in the thousandth anniversary of the Hijra, which was the journey the Prophet Muhammad took by Mecca to Medina in 622 CE. The Jewish Sabbatian movement anticipated the end on the planet in 1666. In late eighteenth-century central China the White colored Lotus World awaited the return with the Buddha to set an end to suffering.
All of these developments may best become understood inside the context of notions of the past in which significant change was either lack of – or sudden and awesome. Prospect Neither a deductive nor an initiatory approach to the first modern community is entirely sufficient. A deductive approach needs to see the world following a Eurocentric roadmap to modernization (one that The european union itself might not have followed). An inductive approach respects the diversity of historical knowledge, but this kind of diversity itself can irritate attempts to delineate a discrete list of unifying features.
If historians can tolerate the inconveniences of regional exceptions to every “global” process, the idea of an early modern world has the attractions. Though a point of view that changes the world in regards to European middle is useless, the areas of the early modern world were increasingly called (in America) and mapped (as in China) by Europeans. On the other hand, in its program beyond Europe the idea of an earlier modern universe redresses the distortions with the Orientalist presumption of parochial, timeless, and conservative inertias unaltered by simply European growth.
It recognizes that people of the early on modern age in some ways had more in keeping with each other than with their own forefathers and descendents – time unites in the same way powerfully as place. That facilitates comparative analysis and abets request that trespasses across countrywide boundaries. It sees the whole world as a level, not only pertaining to comparative research, but also for the broadest feasible analysis for the historian’s scrutiny. Further Studying Parker, G. (1996). The Military Trend: Military Development and the Surge of the Western, 1500–1800 (2nd ed. ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge School Press.
Pomeranz, K. (2001). The Great Curve: China, Europe, and the Making of the Contemporary World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University or college Press. Solid, C. N. (1955). Early Modern Globe.
London: University of London, uk Press. Subrahmanyam, S. (1997). Connected Reputations: Notes Toward a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia. Modern Cookware Studies, 31(3), 735– 762.
Thomson, T. H. (1964). The Age of Examen, by T. H. Parry. The Log of Modern History, 36(2), 187–188. Wills, J. E., Jr. (2001). 1688: A Global Background. New York: Norton. The Modern Era The modern age is the briefest and most violent of the 3 main eras of human history. Whereas the era of foragers held up more than 200, 000 years and the provincial era regarding 10, 500 years, the modern era offers lasted merely 250 years. Yet, during this brief era change has been more rapid plus more fundamental than ever before; indeed, masse have grown and so fast that 20 percent of all humans may have lived during these two and a half generations. The modern period is also the most interconnected with the three eras.
Whereas fresh ideas and technologies once took thousands of years to circle the world, today persons from diverse continents may converse because easily as if they occupied a single global village. Background has become globe history in the most literal sense. Pertaining to our purposes the modern period is believed to begin about 1750. But, its root base lay profound in the agrarian era, and we could make an excellent case for a starting particular date of 1500 or even previously.
Determining the final date from the modern era is also trickier. Several scholars include argued that it ended through the twentieth hundred years and that we now live in a postmodern time. Yet, many features of the current era continue today and can persist for some time into the future; as a result, it makes more perception to see the contemporary period as part of the contemporary era.
This fact signifies that we do not understand when the modern day era can end, nor can we see its general shape since clearly even as we might desire. The fact that we cannot see the modern time as a whole causes it to be difficult to designate its main features, and justifies using the deliberately vague label “modern. ” At the moment the classification feature of the modern era seems to be a sharp increase in prices of creativity. New systems enhanced man control over normal resources and stimulated fast population growth. In their convert, technological and demographic alterations transformed lifeways, cultural and religious practices, patterns of health and the aging process, and sociable and personal relationships. To get world historians the modern era poses special challenges.
Were too near see it clearly and objectively; we have so much info that we have problems distinguishing trends from particulars; and change offers occurred quicker than ever before and embraced each of the parts of the world. Here are some is one attempt to develop a coherent overview, depending on generalizations that have achieved wide-ranging acceptance amongst world historians. Major Features and Trends of the Contemporary Era The present day era is definitely the first to have generated a big body of statistical evidence; thus, also, it is the 1st in which we can quantify a lot of the larger changes.
Increases in Population and Productivity Human being populations include increased quicker than ever before throughout the modern time, although progress rates slowed down during the past due twentieth century. Between 1750 and 2150 the number of males and females in the world went up from about 770 , 000, 000 to almost 6 billion dollars, close to an eightfold increase in just two hundred fifty years. This kind of increase is definitely the equivalent of the growth price of about zero.
8 percent per annum and represents a doubling time of about eighty-five years. (Compare this with estimated doubling times of 14 hundred years throughout the agrarian period and ten thousand to nine thousand years through the era of foragers. ) An eightfold increase in human numbers was possible only because productivity rose even faster. The estimations of the economist Angus Maddison suggest that global gross household product went up more than ninety fold during three hundred years, whereas production per person went up nine flip. These unbelievable increases in productivity lay behind each of the most significant alterations of the modern era. Productivity rose partly because fresh technologies had been introduced.
In agriculture, for example , food production kept pace with population growth because of increased crop rotations, increased make use of irrigation, wide-spread application of unnatural fertilizers and pesticides, plus the use of genetically modified plants. However , production also rose because humans learned to use new options for energy. During the agrarian era each man controlled, usually, 12, 500 kilocalories per day (about several times the needed to sustain a human body), and the most effective prime movers available were domestic pets or animals or wind-driven ships.
Throughout the modern time humans have discovered to harvest the large reserves of one’s stored in fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas as well as to exploit the ability lurking within just atomic nuclei. Today every person controls, normally, 230, 500 kilocalories a day—twenty times as much as during the agrarian era. A world of planes, rockets, and elemental power features replaced a global of race horses, oxen, and wood fire. City Sprawl As foule have increased, so has the average size of human communities. In truck about 50 cities had more than 95, 000 residents, and none had higher than a million.
By 2000 thousands of cities acquired more than 95, 000 inhabitants, about 411 had greater than a million, and 41 acquired more than five million. Throughout the agrarian time most people lived and worked in villages; by the end of the twentieth 100 years almost 50 % of the world’s population occupied communities of at least five thousand persons. The speedy decline of villages designated a fundamental alteration in the lives of most persons on Earth.
Because during the arcadian era, the increasing scale communities transformed lifeways, beginning with patterns of career: Whereas most people during the rustic world were small maqui berry farmers, today most people support themselves by income work in a lot of jobs. Innovations in transportation and communications include transformed contact between neighborhoods and regions. Before the nineteenth century not any one traveled more quickly than the speed of a equine (or a fast sailing ship), and the quickest way to transmit drafted messages was by state-sponsored courier devices that used relays of horses. Today messages can easily cross the world instantaneously, and even perishable goods can be transported from one end of the world to a new in just a few hours or times.
Increasingly Intricate and Highly effective Governments Since populations have raised and people’s lives are getting to be more intertwined, more complex varieties of regulation have grown to be necessary, which is why the business of presidency has been changed distinguishly. Most premodern governments were content to control war and taxes, departing their themes to get on with their very own livelihoods more or less unhindered, however the managerial jobs facing contemporary states are much more complex, and so they have to use more hard work in mobilizing and controlling the lives of those they will rule. The huge bureaucracies of modern states happen to be one of the most crucial byproducts in the modern revolution.
So , too, are the constructions of democracy, which allow governments to align their plans more tightly with the requirements and capacities of the large and varied populations they will rule. Nationalism—the close mental and perceptive identification of citizens with the governments—is one other by-product of the new relationships between government authorities and those they rule. The presence of democracy and nationalism may suggest that modern day governments are usually more reluctant to impose their very own will by simply force, however in fact , they may have much more administrative and coercive power than did rulers of the provincial era.
No government of the agrarian age tried to observe the births, deaths, and incomes of all the people that ruled as well as to impose mandatory schooling; yet, many contemporary governments handle these huge tasks routinely. Modern states can also instill violence more effectively and on a larger scale than even the best empires from the agrarian era. Whereas a great eighteenth century cannon could destroy a residence or kill a closely packed band of soldiers, modern day nuclear weaponry can damage entire cities and millions of people, as well as the concerted kick off of many nuclear weapons could end history within just a couple of hours. A implied change in the nature of power is the increased dependence of modern states on business success instead of raw coercion.
Their electric power depends so much on the economic productivity with the societies they rule that modern government authorities have to be powerful economic managers. The creation of more democratic devices of government, the declining significance of slavery, the ending of European imperial power during the twentieth 100 years, the break of the Soviet command overall economy in 1991, plus the ending of apartheid (racial segregation) in South Africa in 1990 and 1991 every reflected an expanding awareness that successful monetary management works better than crudely coercive kinds of rule.
- Category: Record
- Words: 5080
- Pages: 17
- Project Type: Essay