the criminal offenses of fraud through the marxism


Justice, Marxism

In this dissertation proposal, We are talking about two theories (Marxism Theory and Merton’s Tension Theory) that help clarify the criminal offense of robbery. Both hypotheses talk about how crime is usually socially caused instead of getting personal and individualised, consequently criminal behaviour is a sociable phenomenon (White, Haines Asquith, 2017). I argue that both these theories describe theft, however there are restrictions for each theory that I will also discuss as well as comparing and contrasting all of them throughout this kind of proposal. Criminal offenses: Theft Robbery is the work of currently taking another person’s things or house without that person’s consent. A person that performs this is known as a thief (Kaplan, Binder and Weisberg, 2012). Frequency In Sept 2017, the entire number of thefts recorded (excluding motor theft) across complete of New Zealand was 5, 948. This number improved with time, the overall number of thefts recorded in December 2017 was 6, 491 and in January 2018 was several, 289. These types of of A lot had probably the most amount of thefts recorded (POLICE DEPARTMENT).

Robbing is now becoming more of a dominant problem in New Zealand. Manifestations Manifestation may be the implication or the effect of a task or a meeting (Davies Pearson, 1999). The manifestation of theft in line with the Merton’s Pressure Theory would be economic gain for that person (White, Haines Asquith, 2017). Stealing becomes a way to survive, as discussed in the Genesis section under. The outward exhibition of theft according to the Marxist Theory could also be economic gain but as a form of subsistence for the non-elites and also to maximise income for the elites (White, Haines Asquith, 2017). Genesis We do not think that the social strata of liberal countries such as Fresh Zealand as being defined through class (France Roberts, 2017). In New Zealand, the social buy is described through ‘social and economical status’ (p. 12). The between the New Zealand wealthiest and the weakest has increased over time, causing social inequality (Rashbrook, 2013).

France and Roberts (2017) state that the social school also keeps a ‘pivotal place in analyses of strength constraints in young peoples’ origins and destinations’ (p. 69). The poorer folks are therefore caught in their condition and are unable to get out, all of these factors drive criminal and delinquent behaviours (as a your survival strategy). Consequently , the genesis for the Merton Stress Theory and Marxism Theory would be the inequality in the sociable and economic status. Merton’s Strain Theory According to Strain Theory written in Crime and Criminology textual content by White, Haines Asquith (2017), offense is the reaction to social disjuncture that display a ‘social strain in a society’ (p. 77). Merton argued that crime could be described with regards to two variables- culturally defined goals of your society and institutionalised means through one can achieve these types of goals (Merton, 1938). In respect to Merton (1983) individuals have the same cultural goal influenced by society- the American Dream of prosperity, status and success but have different in order to achieve individuals goals. Consequently , people can easily respond to strain in five different ways: conformism, innovation, ritualism, retreatism and rebellion (Merton, 1938).

So , to accomplish wealth and success, persons tend to trim towards overdue behaviour. Keeping this at heart, I believe that individuals that take are innovative and can be understood using this theory. A research study done by The modern Zealand Legislative house in 2011, confirmed an overall embrace income inequality measured by simply Gini rapport in 85 (0. 27) and 08 (0. 33). It also brought up an increase in poverty rates of younger persons, especially Maori and Pacific children. School of the Children’s Commissioner discovered that lower income had negative impact on the children’s’ education, confidence, interpersonal groups along with having emotional and physical effects (Bellamy, 2011). Because of the social inequality in New Zealand, persons lack the means to attain the desired goals and robbing becomes a success strategy. According to the article written by Agnew (2012), the frustration caused by the possible lack of means causes the individuals to ‘try to get money nevertheless acts just like theft’ (p. 33).


¢ Theory ideal applies to reduced class people->Will not talk about those (rich people) that have the resources and therefore the methods to achieve the goals but nonetheless lean towards stealing.

¢ This theory likewise does not describe why criminal offenses are more common in a certain age group (such as overdue teenagers steal more than older people)

¢ Theory centers mainly upon individual responses to pressure, not upon group structured crime

¢ Doesn’t discuss the intra- and inter- personal aspects of the criminal offense which can be described better my spouse and i. e. by the labelling theory Marxist Theory Marxist Theory is based on the study of the division of the power in society that causes social and economic inequality. The elites (that have institutionalised means) hold the ‘decisive power in a society’ (p. 116) to ascertain what is criminal and precisely what is not, although the non-elites (working class) don’t have that decisive electric power (White, Animosités Asquith, 2017). Similar to the Merton’s Strain Theory, the working school (less effective people) happen to be demoralised inside the capitalist world and are likely to lean to criminal conduct such as thieving as a way of subsistence. This article by Stanley (2016) discusses the existing social inequalities in New Zealand and how the marginalised populace are associated with crimes such as theft. On the other hand unlike the Merton Pressure Theory, the Marxist approach also points out why the powerful (the elites) also steal (e. g. fraud) as well despite the fact that they have the wealth plus the means. The main reason for this is the need to gather and to ‘maximise profit’ (117) so that they can keep their first class status and economic dominance (White, Haines Asquith, 2017). An example in New Zealand would be when ever Lynette Watson embezzled more than $114, 1000 from her own nonprofit Maori trust (Chisholm, 2017).


¢ Certainly not everyone who may be in low income commits the act of theft, same as the Merton theory- Doesn’t talk about the intra- and inter- personal aspects of the crime

¢ Theory is too broad and generalised (Williams, 2012).

¢ Romanticises the image in the thief because the ‘primitive class rebel’ (129), understating the injury caused to the victims (White, Haines Asquith, 2017).

¢ This article by Stanley (2016) I used while evidence to say that existing social inequalities can lead to thievery could be prejudiced, as it is authored by a movie director of criminology aiming at the Victoria Students.

¢ A point to notice would be that the focus on the powerful people stealing is far more business related and on a much larger level (e. g they are more unlikely to shoplift and make minor fraud crimes just like this) compared to the non-powerful. Consequently , this theory doesn’t make clear why a few powerful people would grab the same things as the non-powerful people.

¢ Theory variations on Press (powerful) that just focuses on selected groups of persons (such while certain cultural groups) once reporting about the so-called crimes of theft, so what we see is very selective reports, the working school do not get the entire picture Analysis.

¢ Both Merton’s and Marxism’s theories offer good answers on fraud.

¢ However , the Marxist theory can describe why wealthy people would steal, yet even so will not explain why some highly effective people could steal precisely the same things because the non-powerful people

¢ Both Merton and Marxism explain why lower-class persons steal as a result of lack of means and as just one way of survival really well.

¢ Both theories do not give attention to the intra- and inter- personal aspect of theft and neither talk about why thievery is perhaps more prevalent in a certain age group.

I contended that equally Merton’s Tension and Marxist Theories clarify the criminal offense of theft well. However , I also talked about just how Marxism’s theory explains several aspects of robbery better (i. e. for what reason rich persons would steal) which Merton’s theory of means ends equation don’t explain. I also mentioned the similarities between the two theories and exactly how both theories explained very well why the working class people steal. To summarize, I think we could look at the two theories to describe some aspects of crime, however it is important to notice that there are limitations to each theory. This just goes to show that criminal behaviour is very very subjective and fuzy.

  • Category: essay
  • Words: 1433
  • Pages: 5
  • Project Type: Essay