the causes of the problem of louis xvi essay

During 1780s to 1790s Portugal was in total chaos. France was ruled by the Bourbon family California king Louis XVI from 1754 to 1793, it was a total monarch and so they had absolute power and did not reveal it with a legislature. The specific situation was already negative before Paillette XVI started his reign, but condition got worse. In the end, there was clearly a revolution in France and a vast quantity changes to the society plus the government of France. Louis XVI him self was executed and murdered; while Italy was established being a democratic country.

There were several reasons for Louis’s downfall: interpersonal, economic, law and order situations. Also factors such as the Age of Enlightenment the moment some philosophers had new ideas showing how the country should be ruled, the inequalities among estates, the bankruptcy from the government, the attitude and behaviour of Louis XVI, and the bad economic of France. All these factors got caused the anger of the people. Though Louis XVI couldn’t help with some of the trigger that generated his drop, he was partially responsible for his own destructions.

Louis’s family caused the bankruptcy with the government, great indecisiveness, his act of treason great attempt to get away, were every one of the causes that led to his own downfall. The salary of the govt mainly came from heavy taxation on the individuals and several situations led to the bankrupt of government. One of the main reasons was Louis fantastic family, largely due to his wife, Jessica Antoinette, who have spent lots of money in recreation such as garments, jewelry, and gambling. Your woman even put in lots of money in creating amazing gardens organised like a actual peasant town around her palace, in which many persons found it pointless and silly. (Brooman, 1992, p. 15, 18, 19) Paillette, as a king, was a bad decision maker and could hardly control the federal government and his persons. His heroes were not appropriate to be a full. He desired the enjoyment life of the king, specifically hunting, rather than attending assemblies and regulating the country. (Gilbert, 1995, s. 7)

John was not able to use pressure to grind the wave, and he and his enthusiasts only approved compromise in order to was compelled upon all of them, which angered the Assembly whom became worried about the king’s motives. (Gilbert, 1995, p. 18) He angered more radical revolutionaries by regularly going back in the promises to take important fresh reforms. (Gilbert, 1995, p. 7) Following people’s demonstration in Fort, Louis XVIconsidered sending his army in to Paris to recapture this. But this individual considered that the soldiers could possibly refuse his orders that he had up control of Rome and purchased his military services back to it is barracks. He allowed the folks to set up their particular military push, the Nationwide Guard; as well formed a brand new local government, the Paris Commune. Towns and cities all over France adopted the example of Paris. Rioting crowds assaulted town admission, forced your royal representatives, and set up their own communes and Countrywide Guard models. (Brooman, 1992, P. 33) Louis XVI and his relatives also attemptedto escape through the Tuileries Palace to Austria in June 1791. “It made it clear that he was a reluctant associate at best and might turn his back for the constitution as well as system of limited monarchy any kind of time moment.  (Janowitz, 2006, Louis XVI’s Flight)

Louis was deeply unhappy while using Civil Metabolic rate. He on the sides with the priests who declined to take the oath, which usually made it look like he compared the revolution and induced angry crowds of people protesting. Louis decided to leave France, to get support from Queen’s brother, Emperor of Austria. The Assembly suspected that he may try to avoid, there were guards at every door in the palace. They were 50km from the frontier when they had been recognized. Information of their escape was delivered ahead as well as the local authorities had been waiting for them in the small town of Varennes. The King fantastic family were arrested and sent back to Paris. Crowds shouted insults and vomited at the home windows as they gone. People in France no longer trusted the king after their make an attempt to escape. (Gilbert, 1995, L. 37-38)

As a result of mistrust as well as the tension that was gaining the country, Louis feared pertaining to his lifestyle and he sought help from Luxembourg, in which the chief was California king Marie Antoinette’s brother. About April 1792, France reported war on Austria. France was easily defeated and this turned on suspicions of traitors. “The Assembly ordered every enthusiast in Paris to the frontier, put a watch on all foreigners, and decided that priests who also refused to take an oath of devotion should be expelled¦ (Brooman, 1992, p. 39) The King disagreed with the order presented, which angered the people. They also discovered that Louis purposely weakened the army of France because he didn’t support the revolutionary conflict effort and wanted protection. (Gilbert, 1992, p. 39-40) Louis certainly was not a good leader of a country. “He has not been capable of leading a country in problems.  (Gilbert, 1995, s. 7) Persons even came to think having been a traitor of the nation.

Other than Louis’s own mistake other personal factors were responsible. Inside the 18th 100 years, known as the Age of the Enlightenment, some philosophers spoke with the new concepts of how the federal government should rule the country. Philosophers such as David Locke, Souverain de Montesquieu, and Jean Jacques Rousseau, their ideas influenced the folks in France during that time. John Locke’s main theory stated that the government should certainly provide defensive services to its individuals, mainly about life, liverty and house. The only good reason that the government had the power was because the people entrusted their very own rights to the government. When the government has not been doing all their job, persons had the right to withdraw and through rebellion, everything could be restored once again. (Landry, 1997-2004, LOCKE’S VIEWS ON GOVERNMENT) Montesquieu was against royal debt slavery. He thought that all it was required for separate the strength of executive, legal, and contencioso powers of government.

And he suggested that “if one person or physique holds several or all these powers, in that case nothing stops that person or body via acting tyrannically; and the persons will have zero confidence in their own security.  (Hilary, 2003, Liberty) Rousseau gone further than Locke. He developed the General Can, which suggested that instead of focusing on the eye of an individual, the interest with the majority ought to be the main target. (Kemerling, 1998-2002, General Will) The ideas of these philosophers had inspired the people at that time which came up with the people’s prefer to fight for their own rights, as a result led to the revolution. Also, France wanted to build better relationship to foreign countries, such as America. In 1780s, France involved in a conflict against Britain, helping the American colonists in the War of Self-reliance. Even in peacetime, its large military services and navy blue continued to use lots of money. (Gilbert, 1995, g. 8)

This kind of increased the money problem that the country was having. Other than the economical problem, there was clearly also problem in the people of the cheapest class. They were unhappy with the ruling from the government that they set up the National Assemblage. They prompted the upper classes to join all of them. The business of the National Assembly was the beginning of the trend and questioned against the king’s power. (Gilbert, 1995, g. 13) Furthermore, in August 1789, from the outcomes of the Great Fear, a great incident exactly where rumours was spread about “the hobereau were looking to starve the peopleby hoarding grain,  (Brooman, 1992, p. 33) and that led to the anger of typical. Nobles were afraid and so they gave up all their rights and dues. A few times afterwards, the Countrywide Assembly given Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen. “It stated that every men had been free and equal in rights. The strength in England belonged to the whole people, not simply the full.  (Brooman, 1992, s. 33) This kind of encourage individuals to fight for their particular rights and this all ought to be treated evenly.

There were as well many social and economical factors, which are responsible for the downfall of Louis XVI. Some of the elements existed for years, even before Louis XVI became king, which were known as the long term causes. One of these was the negative harvest. More than years, the people of the people increased, while there was already a shortage of meals. But during 1787-1789, bad weather destroyed many of the seeds. As a result, loaf of bread prices travelled up and the farmers experienced smaller cash flow. “The cost of a loaf of bread went up by fifty percent between 12 months.  (Mantin, 1992, g. 14) Families which spent everything on bread, ended buying clothes, shoes, candles, fuel and etc. Also, the France federal government was insufficient money to get sometime, therefore they cut down on their bills. As a result, the factories shed business and workers dropped their jobs, which generated difficult living. (Brooman, 1992, p. 21-22) Besides, another reason was the inequalities among the people in the country.

The French society was divided into three estates. The First Estate was made up of the clergy, the Second Real estate was the nobles, and the Third included the center class, which were the vendors, lawyers and government officials, and the peasants who created the largest group and could barely feed their loved ones. The local clergy and nobles didn’t need to pay most taxation, while the third estate, particularly the peasants, needed to provide almost all the country’s tax revenue. The middle category were being among the most important persons in The french language society nevertheless were not acknowledged because they will belonged to the 3rd estate. (World Book 2002 F7, 2002, p. 525) The Initially and Second estates likewise had various privileges and rights. For instance , the Initially estate got their own law courts plus the Second property received particular treatment in law courts and failed to have to do armed forces service. The 3rd Estate had to pay fees to their homeowner and give the Church part of their cash flow. (Brooman, 1992, p. 7)

The different example of bumpy treatment is also seen in theEstates General. In the Estates Standard, each property had just one vote, although the third house had several representatives as the other two properties combined. This implies, if the initial and second estate didn’t agree with the statement, that couldn’t end up being passed through as well. (World Book F7, 2002, p. 525) In 1791, the Legislative Assembly is made to establish regulations. It selected a metabolism that manufactured France a limited monarchy which has a one-house legislature. France was divided into locations, each with elected local authorities for county. But the directly to vote and hold general public office was limited to residents who paid a certain amount of taxes, which were known as active citizen; and the relax were called passive citizen. (World Publication 2002 F7, 2002, L. 525-526)

This is especially unfair to those who could not pay the taxes, which was one third in the population. Another trigger was the Storming in the Bastille, which in turn happened in 1789. On July 16, a crowd of 8000 marched to the castle of the Bastille, which was a jail and wherever many weapons were stored. The Bastille was a symbol of hoheitsvoll power that they hated. They wanted to damage and take those weapons inside. They shattered in following the governor of the Bastille rejected to hand the fortress over. Although there had been many soldiers in and around Paris, they rejected to stop this kind of attack and the people shortly captured the Bastille. (Mantin, 1992, p. 17; Brooman, 1992, g. 30) “Louis was burning off control of the army.  (Mantin, 1992, p. 17) Not long after the incident, staff and cowboys all over France attacked all their lord’s house after whispers about hobereau trying to “starve the people by simply hoarding wheat, and paying the gangs of wanderers to attack farms and terrorize the peasants.  (Mantin, 1992, p. 17; Brooman, 1992, g. 33) These conditions, bad economic, inequality, and anger of people, affected the world a lot.

To summarize, it was apparent that there was many reasons that contributed to the downfall of Louis XVI. Among them, he was responsible for a few of them, such as the untamed spending of government’s money, his indecisiveness, act of treason, and coward activities of escapes. But on the other hand, there was political, interpersonal and financial causes that was past the King’s control: the ideas from the philosophers, poor economic, and inequalities among the citizens. The challenge of Portugal was without a doubt not the results of one person’s blunders, but of complex causes and no you should be specificallyblamed.

Bibliography

Ebooks

” Gilbert, Adrian, (1995) The French Revolution, England: Wayland (Publishers) LIMITED

” Brooman, Josh, (1992), Revolution in France, Britain: Longman Group UK Limited

” World Book 2002 F7 (2002). United States of America: World Book, Incorporation.

” Mantin, Peter. (1992) The French Wave. Oxford: Heinemann Educational

” Hetherton, Greg. (1992) Ground-breaking France. Cambridge University Press

Internet (online)

” Miss Lavelle. (2006) The Causes of the French Revolution. Retrieved 26 Drive, 2006 from < http://www.schoolhistory.co.uk/year8links/frenchrevolution_causes.shtml>

” Janowitz, Neil. (2006) SparkNote around the French Revolution (1789-1799). Retrieved 25 Mar, 2006 coming from.

” Landry, Peter. (1997-2004). Blupete ” Literature ” Biographies ” John Locke. Retrieved twenty-five March, 06 from

” Bok, Hilary. (2003). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ” Baron de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. Retrieved twenty-five March, 2006 from

” Kemerling, Garth. (1998-2002). Philosophypages ” Enlightenment II ” Rousseau ” General Will. Retrieved 25 March, 06 from

1