research laboratory questions forensic science

1 . Precisely what is the criminal offense that the video focuses on? The crime the video concentrates on is the kidnapping and death of Charles Lindbergh Junior. 2 . What evidence did investigators possess about the crime inside the 1930s? A homemade step ladder left by the perpetrator, it had been 8-10 at night when the criminal offense occurred, no one heard the infant crying by his space, and there were a ransom note kept at the field of the offense. 3. What evidence performed investigators value to find a think? What was available at Hauptmann’s house that linked to the crime? One piece of data used to discover a suspect was the gold qualification money that was given in the ransom.

The stuff bought at Hauptmann’s house linking him to the criminal offenses were $14, 000 in the ransom funds, a hand gun, and other suspect items. 4. What info does the step ladder give forensic scientists? Railroad 16 with the ladder was identified as as being a piece of a floorboard from Hauptmann’s attic room, linking him to the making of it in his house.

5. What makes it believed that Hauptmann got accomplices in the crime? It had been believed that Hauptmann acquired accomplices just for this crime because 2/3 in the ransom funds was not in the possession along with Douglas’s encounter as a mental profiler, activities that you need multiple offenders who are able to reinforce the other person psychologically as well as feed off each other to commit a crime such as this, as well as that it was dangerous to attempt a crime such as the kidnapping and killing of the Lindbergh baby by itself. 6. What evidence is present to cast suspicion about John Knoll? What facts exists to suggest that this individual wasn’t included? John was allegedly the man presented the ransom at the Bronx cemetery, casting suspicion upon him. Yet , what kind of clears the air for him a little bit can be Dr . Condon’s accounts, which in turn frankly seemed to be somewhat inconsistent, as well as the current day handwriting analysis which makes points to it being unlikely that John Knoll wrote the ransom records.

7. What evidence is available to claim that Charles Lindbergh himself was involved in the kidnapping and death of his son? Will you agree or disagree with this theory? Why? Evidence that evidently suggests that Lindbergh was included was his hatred in the police, his behavior, as well as the keeping in the ransom paperwork and group meetings secret, producing people believe he was covering something. I don’t wish to believe that Lindbergh might orchestrate the kidnapping of his individual child, but , there is data pointing to him performing such a specific thing, and the biggest piece of it would be his desire for the diathesis movement. There are some people thatwould go to superb lengths to attempt to have the ideal kid that they could (even though the ideal kid they could have is usually one that they will produced to begin with, anomaly or no anomaly). eight. Based on evidence presented in the video, what do you think happened? What evidence supports your theory? Individually, what I believe happened is usually that the kidnapping from the baby was indeed orchestrated by Charles Lindbergh, which there were at least three people involved, individuals being Lindbergh, Knoll, and Hauptmann. I also think that there was a possibility of more people getting involved, to be truthful, it would not surprise me if even more people were linked to this case.

I’d like to focus on Knoll for a bit. What I think directly links him to the case is the fact that this individual suddenly came into a large sum of money and was spending that extravagantly, plus the fact that he remained in Europe right up until Hauptmann was convicted. While some people may look at that as being a coincidence, I actually don’t believe it to become a coincidence, I do believe that having been laying low in Germany before the trial was over. The next matter I would like to slip on over to is the handwriting analyses. The thing that was found during each evaluation of Knoll and Hauptmann’s handwritings was that it was less likely that both of them had been the authors of the ransom note, which I feel facilitates my theory that chances are there were more than just them included. It’s a probability that Lindbergh himself would have written these notes, if you absolutely think about it.

The final factor I want to look at the death itself. I feel just like the death by itself was an accident, the kidnapping wasn’t, but for me, I believe death alone was. I could see Lindbergh wanting to get rid of his baby and adding him in an institution due to the fact that he had imperfect genes (as categorized by Lindbergh), but to get rid of one’s individual baby due to their genetics? That to me does not make sense, even though, the thought of getting rid of your baby just because they you do not have good family genes doesn’t make sense to me possibly, I would appreciate my baby no matter what. We don’t think Lindbergh wanted his baby deceased, just in an institution. The bottom line is this, the things i believe took place was a great intentional kidnapping and a great unintentional murder with at the very least 3 perpetrators.

1