philosophical point of view action i decided essay

Sociological Perspective, Nuclear Medicine, Parent Responsibility, Feminine Prisons

Research from Dissertation:

However , with regards to health-related concerns, I do not really believe that very subjective personal opinions and emotions can influence one’s moral decision-making. Evidence is clear that smoking is definitely harmful to the smoker, as well as to the person who have inhales second-hand smoke. In addition , we were inside my parents’ home. I know they own hard and fast rules about smoking on their house.

My friend got a different point-of-view: he acquiesced to my own request, yet said that this individual thought his country a new more reasonable attitude towards cigarette smoking: a practical approach. “If everyone is cigarette smoking, ” this individual said, “why not grant it – simply banning it will not force people to leave. That is a personal decision, and even more pleasure is given by allowing people the alternative, particularly if everybody or everyone in the get together is a cigarette smoker. “

My buddy is a good man, but good people can easily still manifest addictive, ‘bad’ patterns (one explanation that the idea of virtue ethics falls smooth in relation to health issues). Also allowing individuals to smoke socially, even if it truly is part of their culture, makes the impression that the behavior is acceptable and causes harm to contemporary society: thus, I believe that my anti-smoking position is not merely, in Kohlberg’s terms, a type of rule-related physical exercise (although I was enforcing parent rules) yet one based upon my opinion in a common principle of upholding the integrity from the body plus the right for individuals to protect their health. The ideal of a person to be totally free of carcinogenic chemicals always, trans-culturally, trumps those of someone’s flexibility to choose to pollute his body.

DQ3: Nuclear protection

The build of this workout – determining who will live and who will die – sends chills down my own spine. Nevertheless , perhaps the proper way to approach the exercise is through the technique of elimination. The first person We would eliminate is the male mental patient, for fear that he would shortage the mental stability required to survive intended for an extended period of time in a shield. I would as well eliminate the six-year-old female child, as awful as this could be, because a small child would likely be as well fragile to survive in a post-apocalyptic scenario, and would need even more care than be able to give care in front of large audiences.

I would definitely preserve the life of the man carpenter and male biologist, simply because they can provide very useful, practical skills that will enable others to survive, after emerging from the shelter. Building homes and understanding the neurological damage of nuclear warfare is essential for future years survival of the human race. To repopulate the world and also to produce a new platform of laws, I would pick the female lawyer, even though your woman might be as well old to reproduce. (But at age 40, there is nonetheless the chance). Finally, I would personally select the pregnant college student – she would have sufficient knowledge to make a contribution to the world, may clearly contribute to repopulating the world, and this would as well save 1 additional existence. The male physician is too outdated, although his skills are useful, and the ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) provides religious rather than vital practical abilities. Although spirituality is of wonderful value during trying moments, practical needs must