No nation for older guys and the notion of money
Money is arguably one of the oldest sociable conventions even now utilized in the earth, constantly expanding its impact on the human race. Money when bought forgiveness and respect, today, one can purchase affect in government and even extend life with the obligation amount of money. Although seemingly wicked, money”like virtually any technology”is certainly not inherently morally wrong. In No Country for Old guys, Cormac McCarthy uses the motif involving to elucidate the problems popular among all human inventions and, in a sense, responds to Steve Paul II’s questioning of mankind’s anxiety about its own operate. McCarthy claims that money”along with all different technology”separates guy from the immediate results of his actions and shields him by emotional engagement in situations, permitting him to enter into morally compromising positions without being completely conscious of this. Man concerns this of money unknown outcome and its significance above all else.
Only $13.90 / page
In Zero Country pertaining to Old Men, cash serves as a justification of wrongdoing in, as money”whether received or perhaps given”distances character types from the results of their actions. Llewelyn Tree continually will pay people off”taxi drivers, innocent bystanders, conventional hotel owners”in in an attempt to protect himself. Though this strategy stems from a desire to endure, the householder’s acceptance from the money has a more subtle meaning. In about any instance, the recipients of the money in the beginning refuse to become involved (McCarthy, 48). Although they recognize that Moss is definitely asking these to do something wrong, their greed eventually overcomes them. This pattern of behavior displays cognitive dissonance: the people realize that they are abetting Moss, but they nonetheless go along with what Moss says. Money, in such a case, enables the characters to clear their notion. They encourage themselves with their ignorance and later do the jobs Moss compensates them to carry out. McCarthy presents Carson Wells in a similar manner. Wells is a great amiable character, one who probably considers himself a man with both good and bad attributes. Although he kills persons for a living, he tries to help Moss and stop Chigurh. He seems to separate his identity by his brand of work, as well as the reason this individual kills is apparently solely that clients shell out him for this. This manner of thinking allows Wells plus the other personas to detach themselves in the situation: they did not cause dire events, but merely allowed such violence to take place. Such an approach also, however , entangles them in the situation with out their noticing it, typically leading to their very own demise.
Apathy subsequently follows this kind of detachment coming from reality. Since seen in Moss’ coldness if the Mexican is dying of thirst, the group of boys’ indifferent acceptance of Moss’ blood-soaked cash, and the teenager’s lack of embarrassment when Chigurh gets apart, money takes in attention away from the humanity of situations. Technology, then, lessens the expectations humans have for each other. Just as a farmer is not supposed to manually plow his area if he has a tractor to do so, Tree does not anticipate anyone to widely offer support unless this individual has funds to pay for that. In fact , when a bleeding and helpless Tree (in a position that theoretically would stir up some level of sympathy) asks a Mexican man to assist him get to the hospital, the man does not agree until he is paid. Although difficult to declare, compassion to get strangers offers seemingly pale away, replace by an apathetic sense of entitlement. That technology elicits this adverse behavior is almost never discussed, on the other hand. Acknowledging that technology is usually imperfect admits man’s faults and weeknesses, thus inserting man in a situation of weakness. Moss refuses to accept the repercussions of taking the money are more than he can manage, and this refusal ultimately causes not only his own loss of life but also the fatality of the hitchhiker he will help and of his wife too (90). Human beings, by nature, aims to minimize weakness, as it sets control into the hands more. Man concerns what this individual cannot control, but in the case, what he cannot control is a outcome of what he himself has made.
McCarthy uses the environment of a medication war to highlight aspects of human beings that appear in everyone, such as the fear of man’s own creation. Oddly, probably none of the heroes who support Moss get considerable physical descriptions. These faceless character types represent the most popular man, and so they do what anyone will do underneath similar circumstances: they mind their business and do what they were advised. The technology used in the book, specifically money, ought to make this easier to get man to act, but rather it enables the “tendencies of his own will” to remain passive (Redemptor Hominis, 15). Mans fear of his creations comes from the fact that one may know the right thing to do but still not really act, or even more troubling, know the dimensions of the correct actions but not attention enough to do it. This internal turmoil creates a moral dilemma rampant in culture. Because of this, McCarthy invents a blatantly bad situation to shed light on an even more insidious menace to our tradition: our own technology.