genuine angle of mercy through the crimean warfare


Do you accept the view that Mary Seacole, and not Florencia Nightingale, was the real ‘angle of mercy’ during the Crimean War? Throughout the Crimean war, both Mary Seacole and Florence Nightingale showed areas of being angels. The word ‘angel’ suggests a heavenly individual who is mindful of the soldiers’ needs, and ‘mercy’ means showing closeness and forgiveness, and the ‘angel of mercy’ basically suggests a compassionated and kind-hearted person who empathizes and helps soldiers in will need. Although Nightingale had confirmed the aspects of being an “angel of mercy, the amount of work and commitment Seacole got put in exceeds Nightingale’s; i really believe Jane Seacole should get the title from the real “angel of mercy.

Florence Nightingale actions mainly focused on the hygiene and cleanliness, as well as the organization in the hospital because the majority of the death was due to disregard of sterilization. Source U is a lithograph of one from the wards in the Barrack Hospital in Scutari, where Nightingale was in charge of.

It demonstrated the hospital was clearly expending organized with windows opened, clean floor, wide space between structured beds, recommending that the soldiers’ conditions had been getting better.

Nightingale was very hardworking, because even at night she accustomed to walk around the hospital carrying a lamp to evaluate the people, hence the girl with also known as the “The Girl with the Lamp throughout the record, which reveals her commitment in her work as a nurse. Your woman certainly had “formidable gifts of organization as it says on origin V, and her engagement in the conflict had also made a huge impact on the death rate, which will reduced by 42 per 1000 to 2 every 1000 in June 1855. Despite the show up of the fatality, 5000 males died in her hospital due to poor hygiene in the winter of 1854-1855 before the sanitary commission came, yet your woman refused to acknowledged it turned out from the insufficient sanitation and said the men were “half dead when they were brought in, because at that time she don’t know that a healthcare facility was created on top of a cesspool. In addition to that, it was exposed in the notification written by God Palmerston to Lord Panmore that the sanitary arrangement was really done by Doctor Sutherland and Dr . Grainger, and still Nightingale took all the credit.

Despite the fact that, Nightingale made positive effects on the course of the battle and made a way to get improving inside the nursing discipline, her activities aren’t enough to fit the of an “angel of mercy, since your woman was a severe, cold girl who belittled her very own nurses in support of checked the patients from a distance, completely neglecting the importance of consoling and communicating with the soldiers, since it is also demonstrated on the origin U ” on the lithograph Nightingale is observed leading the wounded; however , she maintains a distance inbetween. This shows that Nightingale can be recognized through the image of the clean organized ward, rather than a kind-hearted and compassionated doctor treating the patients, as well as the ‘angel of mercy’ ought to provide both equally physical and mental has to the jewellry as the title says, given that they will not only go through physical disorders but will become mentally impacted by the conflict, and Nightingale failed to present mental treatment.

On the other hand, Martha Seacole’s events fit the image of the “angel of mercy and supply V good remarks Seacole and her engagement during the war, despite becoming rejected by British regulators due to her race and background. The girl went to Crimea by their self to help the wounded, whereas Nightingale who have went there in request from the Minister of War, Sidney Herbert, to visit help in the war. Seacole had no hospital to deal with the wounded, but she built her own “British Hotel in Balacava simply by her funds, unlike the government funded “admirable hospital in Scutari, which took days of boat trip from the battlefield. In source v, it also tells just how Seacole was “in the particular front line treating the wounded, that has been truly a brave act because during that time females looked weak and refined, let alone belong on the battlefield, but “she showed courage under fire, “unlike a lot of officers and risked her own your life to save other folks.

This as well links towards the idea of ‘angel’ because such as a guardian angel she was protecting these people, and your woman may also have appeared literally like an angel to some of the soldiers since she drifted through the battlefields healing people. This displays the bravery and effort of Seacole sets in helping the soldiers, and the fact that she treated the wounded with the scene may have contributed together with the drop of death-rate. Her “British Hotel was likewise an important retreat to the troops, which once again comes to the concept ‘mercy’, since it says in source V that the military felt even more at ease with “Mother Seacole than in the hospital, because the motel was even more homelike. As opposed to Nightingale, briefly checking the sufferer and placing your order the rns, Seacole was more socializing and hands on approach to the individuals, consequently she was closer with the soldiers seeing that she ran the motel by herself and did everything simply by herself, however Nightingale would very little nursing and more ideal for the operating and managing of the clinic, which shows that she was more of an administrator compared to a nurse.

Seacole approach of treating injured and “patients suffering from cholera and dysentery was far better than Nightingale’s method, displaying that Seacole was more skilled and had more understanding on medicine. Source Versus points out that, Seacole was certainly kind, caring, empathizing like an ‘angel of mercy’, because the girl was the figure of a ‘mother’ to the soldiers and “attentive to their practical needs. The lady nurtured them, like a mother would for children, rendering physical and mental when away from home and family, and in addition providing associated with pocket handkerchief for the wintertime. She was admired and loved by the soldiers that is certainly how the girl received the name “Mother Seacole, plus the soldiers as well arranged a meeting after the conflict to say thanks to her.

Yet , media neglected Seacole’s accomplishment because of her race and attributed it of “angel of mercy to Nightingale. But you will find evidences which will prove that the hospitality that Seacole provided was better and more successful than Nightingale’s. Seacole not merely treated the wounded because she was obviously a nurse, but that aiding soldiers was her love; the strong, brave, identify, motherly characteristic of Seacole allowed her to provide the best for the soldiers throughout the war. The lady did everything from scratch onto her own, although Nightingale was just hired to run the hospital; on top of that Seacole put in even more effort in taking care of the soldiers and was even more compassionated than Nightingale. “Mary Seacole was on hand intended for the troops in the long months the moment nothing much appeared to be happening just like a ‘mother’, which is figuratively close to an ‘angel’, demonstrating that your woman was indeed the real “angel of mercy.


  • Category: essay
  • Words: 1239
  • Pages: 5
  • Project Type: Essay

Need an Essay Writing Help?
We will write a custom essay sample on any topic specifically for you
Do Not Waste Your Time
Only $13.90 / page