Ethics in the Workplace Essay

One of the prerogatives of an company is the selecting of firm personnel.

During the hiring method, prospective personnel undergo methods, such as medication screening, in order to determine all their fitness and competency in rendering their services for the company. When hired while employees, company would on the other hand require them to undergo unique drug screening from time to time, pertaining to after all, a great employee’s diploma is not only during the hiring level but has to be throughout his employment.

This kind of holds true towards the United States Navy blue which just lately imposed a zero-tolerance medicine policy. (http://www. defenselink. mil/specials/drugawareness/usnnews03a. html) The U. S i9000 Navy imposes a mandatory drug-test on the sailors, and those who tested positive of drug employ are subjected to disciplinary actions, including release from assistance. So a question now arises in the brain of the worker whether this drug testing is violating his right to level of privacy. The employer may answer the same in the negative contending that such drug testing or screening is merely for protection reasons.

In order to answer the said issue, there are two schools of thought which should be considered. The first is the Functional theory, as well as the second is definitely the Deontological theory. Under the practical theory, while it is true that drug testing violates one’s right to privacy, if it could benefit the corporation, the workers, as well as the employee himself, then it can be justifiable.

Beneath the utilitarian model, an ethical decision is a decision that produces the best good for the very best number of people. (Jones, et. ‘s. 150) A utilitarian sees random medicine testing while ethical because more personnel and buyers are protected from mishaps caused by drug-using employees than those who are angered with to submit to random drug test. (Gomez, et. ing.

104) As a result, it may enable subordination from the rights of a few individual if the greater aggregation of good outcomes. (Linzer 41) However , this theory schisme with the deontological theory which usually justifies action as proper because of a earlier relationship that antedates the present action. (Schermerhorn, Jr., ou. al, 36) Under this method, it is presumed that each person has primary rights that ought to be protected and revered. A decision is unethical if this deprives someone of critical human rights. (Gomez, ou. al, 103) While the practical theory decides the present goodness of an take action because of its future consequences, the deontological theory emanates from the established marriage. These two moral theories produce an honest dilemma.

Once two requirements conflict, the results is a deadlock. If you are likely to follow 1 ethical rule, it would provide possible rewards but at the same time violates the other. (Schermerhorn, Jr., et. al 36) So , to be able to solve this dilemma, Ross, W. D introduced the concept of pluralism in to the deontological theory. It offers some leeway in decision making and an opportunity to work with discretion in weighing focus among knorke facie responsibilities. (as mentioned in Linzer 41) In respect to one publisher, since a great employer-employee romantic relationship is contractual, certain areas in an employee’s life stay their own exclusive concern without employer has the right to invade them. (DesJardins and Duska 119) But this principle is not absolute.

The right to privacy provides limitations. Seeing that drug tests is a opportinity for obtaining details, the information sought must be strongly related the contract in order for the drug tests not to violate privacy. Furthermore, the purpose of the drug evaluation must be to prevent harm to employees. In such a case, the procedure my over-ride the obligation to respect a great employee’s right to privacy. (DesJardins and Duska 125) Relevant consideration is actually an employee is producing as you expected. It is not required that the functionality must be optimal, or by a high level.

What is required is the fact he is even now able to conduct his designated functions very well despite his drug use. As for the sailor’s with the US Navy blue, they are necessary to be always ready to carry out their work in protecting their region, and it also their very own duty not to put their shipmates at risk, hence, higher level of00 of overall performance is required of these. In conclusion, while it is true the right to level of privacy is a fundamental right. This sort of right is usually not infallible. Drug assessment is not just a form of punishment but it is actually a way to stop harm and prevent injuries in the workplace.

Although it may appear, that the experts are pursuing the utilitarian approach in this case, continue to the deontological theory can be not violated, for what the employers perform is simply to conduct medicine tests to regulate the use of medicines of his employees that it may not impact the latter’s efficiency, and not to completely restrict the use of the same. Drug tests is likewise done only when it is relevant or associated with the job, but not done capriciously, whimsically, and arbitrarily. Performs Cited DeJardin, Joseph and Ronald Duska, Ethics at work Selected Psychic readings in Business Ethics, 1996 Gomez-Mejia, Luis L., et. approach., Management: People, Performance, Modify, 2008 Williams, Gareth 3rd there’s r. et. al, Contemporary Managing, 2000 Linzer, Norman, Solving Ethical Dilemma in Sociable Work Practice, 1999 Ross, W. Deb, The Right and the Good, 1930 Resolving Ethical Dilemma in Social Job Practice, 99 Schermerhorn, John Jr. 3rd there’s r, et. ‘s Organizational Patterns 9th Release. http://www. defenselink. mil/specials/drugawareness/usnnews03a. code