a study of how reginald rose s play twelve angry

Pages: a couple of

The overall game of Proper rights

How do anyone always be safe in the United States with criminals on the pavements and innocent people getting incarcerated? The level of justice in America has been receiving lower and lower yearly. There is just one reason: the jury system in the United States. In Reginald Rose’s play, 14 Angry Guys, the court system is proven ineffective by the means of prejudice and ignorance of the jurors, and jurors jumping to conclusions.

To begin, some people who don’t think they’re prejudiced secretly will be, and they have no idea. For example , after telling a story about how this individual and his son got into a fight, another juror says, “The term was ‘Im gonna kill you. ‘ That’s what this individual said. To his individual father. We dont care what kind of man that was. It had been his daddy. That goddamn rotten youngster. I know him. What theyre like. What they do to you. How they kill you every day. My God, dont the thing is? How come Im the only one who also sees? Jeez, I can feel that knife goin in. ‘” (2. 72) This demonstrates because of his feelings pertaining to his son, he believes all teenage boys are menaces. This likewise shows that there may be some tendency lurking inside every court room worldwide. Juror Five shows one more example of bias earlier inside the play. After saying that he had lived in slums all his life, he admits that, “That child on trial, his type, they’re growing five times as fast as we are. Which is statistic. 5 fold. And they are”wild animals. They’re against us, they hate us, and so they want to destroy us. ” (2. 65) This shows that he thinks that most people that occupied slums will be menaces to mankind. This kind of also implies that Juror 15 might be voting “guilty” as a result of his perspective of the accused. Throughout the play, bias enjoyed a big job in choosing whether or not the defendant was “guilty”.

Second, jurors jumping to results is another difficulty that we have inside the jury system. For example , a few minutes after strolling into the area, the jurors have their first vote and “[¦] eleven to one to get ‘guilty'”. (1. 11) This shows that 12 of the jurors voted with this man to be killed without discussing the situation. If the person that the best performer “not guilty” was another person, a man will be chosen to be killed with no discussion. During the trial, the prosecution stated that the storekeeper said that surgery that was used in the killing was “the only one enjoy it that this individual ever had in stock. inch (1. 21) From jumping to a conclusion, all the jurors believe that this is correct, with small thought about it. The 8th juror earnings to take out a knife that is identical to the knife used in the eliminating. Jumping to conclusions was a big part in the very beginning of the argument, but the sum of it tapered down into absolutely nothing by the end in the play.

Some people may possibly say that the jury strategy is effective as it gives capacity to the right people. This is not true, however , because sometimes the power is given towards the wrong people. There are many people who are hurtful that obtain onto a jury and influence the other jurors from their biased opinion. For instance , when discussing the fantastic, juror five says, “He’s a common, ignorant slob. This individual don’t even speak very good English. inches (1. 37) This shows that wrong persons sometimes have the power to end someone’s your life, and their prejudiced thoughts make them believe what might be wrong. This likewise shows that juror ten is usually not a extremely good juror. People who declare the jury system is powerful because of this explanation are clearly wrong.

In this play, the court system is confirmed ineffective from problems including the selection of the jurors for the ignorance with the jurors. However , the most discovered problems are biased jurors, and jurors getting to conclusions. Many individuals who are prejudiced aren’t aware of it, nonetheless it shows when the time is right. The court system of America needs to improve its juror selection process and we’ll not have these problems.