a literary study for the anglo saxon poetry

The Seafarer, The Wanderer

Anglo-Saxon poetry is most known for their regard towards the timely darkness of the world they were written in. Both from the Anglo-Saxon period, “The Wanderer” and “The Seafarer” show strong qualities of literary works of the time. With a strong romantic relationship in motif and reason for the two poetry, the colors of the narrators create polarity that differentiates “The Wanderer” from “The Seafarer. inches

“The Wanderer” begins using a strong impression of a despair tone perceived by the target audience as he starts to tell his story as an exil, living in around solitude and helplessness. This individual describes his situation: “No one knew me today, no one presented comfort, allowed me feasting or happiness. ” It can be obvious through this verse that his conflict can be interpersonal”he is definitely not with anybody who will present him what he once would never need to ask for. Trusting that the world was corrupt because of these on-land struggles, his tone becomes dark fantastic words throw hatred of evolving occasions when “warmth is dead. inch

However , similar idea of the unwelcoming feeling the property its inhabitants bear can be presented in “The Seafarer, ” only the narrator assumes the situation with what can only become a passion. The narrator essentially finds a way out and utilizes the sea because an escape. Nevertheless his narration is full of complaints of hunger, cool, and lack of shelter, the seafarer likes the issues of residence at sea than on land, in a world he claims is “blown clear of appreciate. ” The seafarer encounters the internal issue of where this individual should be”in the desolate, roaring oceans or in a cultural environment about land. This individual also mentions the changing of times and just how the world offers “bent just like the men who mold it, ” which is further motivation for the narrator’s preference to the marine. His photo of the sea is that of any journey, which usually essentially tends to make the trip worth any kind of turmoil.

The main difference in strengthen comes from the narrators’ viewpoints. Where the wanderer is kept without any decision but to live as a great outcast, the seafarer chooses to outcast himself. Because the wanderer is at this position, the telling of his issue reflects the emotion at the rear of loneliness, rejection, and deficiency of direction. The seafarer, alternatively, knows just what he is putting himself through and selects the tumultuous life at sea as they is in search of journey and adventure, which he feels is unavailable to him on property.

At points in both poetry, there is equally a sense of hopelessness and of wish. There is a theme that problem lies in contemporary society, and the people”lords and rulers in particular”are no longer with the aid of men and women or colleagues. The wanderer is an exile and the seafarer is usually urged into solitude just for this corruption. Thematically, faith as well plays a large role because both the wanderer and seafarer believe Our god is a mountain in a shaken society. As the wanderer provides nowhere to visit and nobody left to accept him, he locations his trust in Our god to lead him and make sure him everything will patch together. For the seafarer and his conflict, his solitude will never become a problem in reaching spiritual achievement because God can be stable regardless of the rough seas of his life. The thought of God being hope is definitely prevalent in both. Christianity is a sole light that shines at night Anglo-Saxon age group, and is described in both equally “The Wanderer” and “The Seafarer. inch

This presence of faith connected with the darker settings presented relate equally poems to common features of Anglo-Saxon poetry, one particular characteristic being the presence of war and uncertainty, both which in turn appear in “The Wanderer” and “The Seafarer. ” The prominent aim of the poems is to details these problems and disputes found within the narration, such as the struggle of changing social philosophies and an absence of growth through experience. Both equally narrators mention of the a drop from what was a “golden age” of rulers and emperors into a world wherever only the solid survive, to be able to accept this change in interpersonal morals is an ongoing obstacle. Both speakers have also realized the impact of life experience after increasing knowledge of lifestyle as a result of their very own situations, the wanderer is aware of what makes a guy wise, as the seafarer concerns realize that his permanent home will be in Heaven, away from the dying universe. These growths were caused by experiences equally good and bad, that this wanderer plus the seafarer experience there is a severe lack of among people who want to only reside in comfort.

No two works of literature can be exactly the same, nevertheless “The Wanderer” and “The Seafarer” pull some very related parallels in terms of theme and purpose that directly bring up them to you will of Anglo-Saxon poetry. It is the subtle differences in the general colors of the loudspeakers that individual these two poetry into their own identities, but within the same category of elegiac Anglo-Saxon poetry.